....But the one thing that is not up for debate is that terrible things happened to innocent children....
How do you know the "...terrible things that happened to children..." based on the 2001 Penn State incident?? Is your ire for Penn State based on the Grand Jury Presentment document that proposed a "rape of a 10 year old" in 2002? A document that could not even get the year of activity wrong....got the age of the alleged "victim" wrong"...was based on the most "liberal" testimony by MM as the core of the assault on Penn State (one version of 3 or more versions of the same event)....which one do you like???
Remember, the "victim" (not victims - plural - but victim) which ties Penn State to these crimes by TSM and Sandusky has publicly admitted MM LIED!!! By the vitims own mouth...No sexual anything - until Millions of $$ were waived at him by PSU's BOT.
This event WAS - and is - a fabrication by an OAG which was focused on creating and nailing a "Jerry Sandusky the Pedophile Monster". It was so directed that it permitted MULTIPLE perjuries in the trial without prosecution of those who provided those "lies under oath". We essentially know NOTHING about those who accused Sandusky other than what their SWORN STATEMENTS provided.
I contend that Sandusky was convicted - right or wrong - in a Kangaroo court that was held for political reasons and to hide political entanglement in the Second Mile Charity. It was the Second Mile and THEIR EXECUTIVES - the primary reporters under the law - that who you need to direct your "ire" - not Penn State who, even under the worst case, did take reasonable action based on what was reported in 2001. Funny, under the full knowledge (and therefore cooperation) of the Sate of PA TSM SHREDDED all its documents AFTER this "scandal" became public. To this day...no public ire directed at TSM, TSM executives OR the $600,000 "campaign donations" to Tom Corbett's reelection. Seems suspicious to me!!!!!!!
Finally, remember 2 things....(1) Penn State Football and Joe Paterno were PUBLICLY reported as NOT covering up anything (remember this was a LONG-TERM COVER-UP CONSPIRACY as charged by Freeh - "The Liar for Hire"). This PUBLIC STATEMENT refuting the existing Public "Story" was made by Frank Fina who was the chief investigator for the Sandusky investigation. (2) IN A COURT OF LAW, the "rape" aspect of ONE of (many) MM version of the "shower incident" was not found credible and legally dropped in Sandusky's charges. This was determined in a trial that was so full of "suspicious issues" regarding basic legal processes it is not funny. It was a LYNCHING! PERIOD.
Because of the known contamination of the evidence concerning the "victims" you so conveniently champion, I assure you that NO ONE KNOWS IF THERE WERE VICTIMS - certainly, the victim at Penn State 2001 is the most suspicious. Sandusky may be guilty as hell...there may be other "victims" that number in the 1000's...who knows??? The "contaminated evidence" is all we know now - even after a "trial" - and with the quality of what is known, WE KNOW NOTHING!!!
Stating that "terrible things happened to innocent children" is true, but that happens everywhere - especially throughout the state PA where the very agencies that are designed to protect kids fail!!! Penn State is NOT a Child Protection Agency: Child abuse is NOT something a Football coach or program can be held accountable for. The Second Mile Charity----That's where you need to look if you want protect "child victims". They are the source...they are cover-up...they are the benefactor of a $600,000 Hush Fund required to create the Penn State Illusion.
If you want to scapegoat Penn State football as a major source for creating "victims" here in PA - like the "Public Story" you buy into implies, just google "Kids for Cash" . After considering all of this, if you are honest with yourself, you may change your mind on who really are the "Penn State Victims".
