• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Penn State Cult (Joe Knew)

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Sort by date Sort by votes
Buckeyeskickbuttocks said:
I could buy that when the old coot was covering up pedophilia for 14 years.... taking that time line to 36 years? Can't buy it.
Click to expand...
After you cover for Jerry the first time it's reported, you are kinda locked in to doing that forever. Otherwise, if you decide to grow a conscience 30 years later and report it you are open to questions about why you did nothing all along.
 
Upvote 0
BWI is a real hoot right now. I hope the forum is a huge troll job. If not, then wow. I would be more than pleased if they all dropped dead. I have never seen a fan base more morally bankrupt than their team. If I was the head of the NCAA, I would shit down the university and tell everyone who is butt hurt to go to hell. But, I'm not.

So, how much better will the world be once the Paterno family dies off?
 
Upvote 0
Chv2KNBUgAALRGz.jpg

Jay Paterno at his best
 
Upvote 0
"Sandusky tragedy"?? Really? Is that what we're calling it?

Certainly, Sandusky was the instrument of tragedy for countless children. But, phrasing it that way seems to imply old Jer was the victim. Of course, that's standard issue for the Pedsters anyway.

DoctorWho said:
I hope Jay Paterno drops dead at his kids birthday party.
Click to expand...

Gotta say, my exhaustion with this relentless family of arrogant, lying manipulators is to the point, I not only hope your wish is granted, but I hope that when he does keel over it's onto the BBQ grill causing a massive conflagration that incinerates the entire clan. These vile, twisted bastards can't go out of existence fast enough.
 
Upvote 0
Jay blathering on about due process.... umm... Hey, dick breath.. Re-read that sentence you wrote... "Because of a single sentence in a court record" I'd tell you to check with your meat-head brother, but I doubt he has any fucking clue either.. but take one guess at what Courts do.... Here's a hint.. they mete out due process, you ignorant fuck.

While we're at it..... it's not a court record so much as the opinion of a Judge (a hint that it may have been an opinion is right at the top of the "record" where it says "Opinion" LINK, scroll down to the document and look at the title of Page 3.), you shit fucker. You know what it is when Judges issue opinions? That's something called due process.

You know what isn't due process? Your "Full public review." Assuming, of course, you don't mean some sort of judicial decision, which I assume you don't, because... well... you know.. this emanates from .. you know... a judicial decision.

Though, in fairness, the opinion at issue is resolving cross motions for summary judgement where certain facts (those most favorable to the non-moving party) are assumed to be true (essentially, it works like this - "OK, judge.. even assuming ALL that is true, we still win as a matter of law"). Still, one can't write anything one wishes in a motion for summary judgement... assertions of this kind aren't mere allegations, rather - in this instance they are admissible evidence (EVIDENTS! if you prefer) submitted to the Court by way of deposition testimony.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
Buckeyeskickbuttocks said:
Jay blathering on about due process.... umm... Hey, dick breath.. Re-read that sentence you wrote... "Because of a single sentence in a court record" I'd tell you to check with your meat-head brother, but I doubt he has any fucking clue either.. but take one guess at what Courts do.... Here's a hint.. they mete out due process, you ignorant fuck.

While we're at it..... it's not a court record so much as the opinion of a Judge (a hint that it may have been an opinion is right at the top of the "record" where it says "Opinion" LINK, scroll down to the document and look at the title of Page 3.), you [Mark May] fucker. You know what it is when a Judges issues opinions? That's something called due process.

You know what isn't due process? Your "Full public review." Assuming, of course, you don't mean some sort of judicial decision, which I assume you don't, because... well... you know.. this emanates from .. you know... a judicial decision.

Though, in fairness, the opinion at issue is resolving cross motions for summary judgement where certain facts (those most favorable to the non-moving party) are assumed to be true (essentially, it works like this - "OK, judge.. even assuming ALL that is true, we still win as a matter of law"). Still, one can't write anything one wishes in a motion for summary judgement... assertions of this kind aren't mere allegations, rather - in this instance they are admissible evidence (EVIDENTS! if you prefer) submitted to the Court by way of deposition testimony.
Click to expand...
ZIIIIIING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Upvote 0
LostLassie said:
"Sandusky tragedy"?? Really? Is that what we're calling it?

Certainly, Sandusky was the instrument of tragedy for countless children. But, phrasing it that way seems to imply old Jer was the victim. Of course, that's standard issue for the Pedsters anyway.



Gotta say, my exhaustion with this relentless family of arrogant, lying manipulators is to the point, I not only hope your wish is granted, but I hope that when he does keel over it's onto the BBQ grill causing a massive conflagration that incinerates the entire clan. These vile, twisted bastards can't go out of existence fast enough.
Click to expand...
Pfft, I hope the whole incident ends up burning happy valley to the ground.

Happy birthday to the ground.
 
Upvote 0
Buckeyeskickbuttocks said:
Jay blathering on about due process.... umm... Hey, dick breath.. Re-read that sentence you wrote... "Because of a single sentence in a court record" I'd tell you to check with your meat-head brother, but I doubt he has any fucking clue either.. but take one guess at what Courts do.... Here's a hint.. they mete out due process, you ignorant fuck.

While we're at it..... it's not a court record so much as the opinion of a Judge (a hint that it may have been an opinion is right at the top of the "record" where it says "Opinion" LINK, scroll down to the document and look at the title of Page 3.), you [Mark May] fucker. You know what it is when a Judges issues opinions? That's something called due process.

You know what isn't due process? Your "Full public review." Assuming, of course, you don't mean some sort of judicial decision, which I assume you don't, because... well... you know.. this emanates from .. you know... a judicial decision.

Though, in fairness, the opinion at issue is resolving cross motions for summary judgement where certain facts (those most favorable to the non-moving party) are assumed to be true (essentially, it works like this - "OK, judge.. even assuming ALL that is true, we still win as a matter of law"). Still, one can't write anything one wishes in a motion for summary judgement... assertions of this kind aren't mere allegations, rather - in this instance they are admissible evidence (EVIDENTS! if you prefer) submitted to the Court by way of deposition testimony.
Click to expand...

slim-pickens-blazingsaddles-4.jpg


God darnit, Mr. KB, you use your tongue prettier than a twenty dollar whore.
 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top