• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Penn State Cult (Joe Knew)

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Sort by date Sort by votes
Joe Pa Thetic said:
If the underwear is not covered in blood and [Mark May], you must acquit.

Edit; damn auto replace ruined my Johnnie Cochran closing argument. :ohno:
Click to expand...

giphy.gif
 
Upvote 0
Joe Pa Thetic said:
Todd Brewster can't be real, can he? I ask all of you this: How can any of you believe Jerry is a pedophile when you have not seen any soiled underwear? You are all just assuming the "worse" of Jerry. :roll1:

Todd Brewster: "BTW, most of you are proving my point. You are convinced Jerry is a MONSTER, so you are all assuming the worse. I thought the same thing, but then I assumed he was innocent and I can see that the facts are not there to convict him. I will admit that Jerry may have had sex with someone, all I am asking for is proof. There is proof Jerry went beyond boundaries. There is proof one boy's mother felt her son's head and found out Jerry showered with her son. There is the statement that Matt said many people walked in on Jerry's performance, but left unsure what was going on. Where are those eyewitnesses today? How come no parent saw soiled underwear? You all condemn Jerry now because that is your opinion, why didn't the professionals at DPW, CYS, and 2nd Mile spot this? Jerry got convicted, because the judge and the jury assumed Jerry was a MONSTER. No one can say that Jerry was given a fair trial, but again you are assuming where there is smoke there is fire. How would any of you like to be rotting in jail for rape, because you played on a coed softball team and several of the coeds said you had sex with them and they sued the bar and sponsor and were paid $3 mil? If I was on that team, you raped me too and prove that you didn't."
Click to expand...
colinfarreldisgusted.gif
 
Upvote 0
The Todd Brewster no soiled underwear line of defense is straight out of the Sandusky trial. Sandusky lawyer Crazy Joe Amendola tried to show that at least one of the the "victims" (or whatever you want to call him) was lying about bleeding from his anus.

"The cross-examination was also graphic as defense attorney Joseph Amendola asked the boy repeatedly whether he bled from the anal rape and whether his mother saw blood on his underwear. He calmly responded that he had bled, but his mother did not discover it on his underwear."

http://abcnews.go.com/US/jerry-sandusky-victim-screamed/story?id=16561876
 
Upvote 0
B1G votes to reinstate Penn State’s bowl revenue a year early

Back in February of this year it was announced that the Big Ten’s Council of Presidents/Chancellors had decided to restore Penn State’s share of the conference bowl revenues for the upcoming football season (2015-16).

As it turns out, it’s postseason Christmas a year early for the Nittany Lions’ athletic department coffers.

Sunday evening in a press release, it was announced by the same B1G entity that it has decided to end Penn State’s revenue ban a year early. As a result, Penn State will receive in the neighborhood of $4.5 million in 2014-15 bowl revenue that had previously been withheld from the university because of the Jerry Sandusky scandal.

Entire article: http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsport...nstate-penn-states-bowl-revenue-a-year-early/
 
Upvote 0
Upvote 0
Jaxbuck said:
Bushwood doing work in that one.

You just knew at least one of these was coming:
View attachment 11159

Also, Satan (the B1G) and it's physical manifestation here on earth (OSU) are just torturing these poor souls. Its epic.
Click to expand...

wtf? We added Rutgers and Maryland b/c we're scared of losing the Conference' shame? Please, we could turn around and add Pitt with hardly a dropoff in athletics or academics.
Talk about being delusional.
 
Upvote 0
First time that I've truly laughed on the pedster board in a long time.

I like the tradition of no names on the jerseys.

But if we insist on having names on the jerseys, please don't allow Spider Caldwell's wife to do the sewing.

Two of the most embarrassing things I've seen with PSU football:
  • The turf conditions vs. LSU in the 2010 Capital One Bowl
  • The names falling off the Penn State jerseys at Virginia
Click to expand...

Yea.....ummm......sure you don't want to add something to that list.
 
Upvote 0
ORD_Buckeye said:
Yea.....ummm......sure you don't want to add something to that list.
Click to expand...

That doesn't surprise me at all. One of the things I've learned over the few years I've spent checking out BWI is that, even though they're very loud about not caring so much about wins and losses, and doing things "the right way" and all that, they DO only care about football.

The Sandusky mess doesn't embarrass them. It angers them that the NCAA and Big Ten would use such a silly little thing like that to make a big stink. But they get embarrassed about things that really matter: field conditions, names on the backs of their iconic jerseys, a man close to 80 years old who might have had a stomach flu (and a change of pants), terrible referees who screw them out of national championships, etc.
 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top