billmac91
Head Coach
Just posted this in game thread, although it probably belongs here...just my .02 cents.
I made the statement during the Indiana game, that I'd prefer they go back to a "Tebow-esque" offense around Barrett. Give him 1 read on pass plays, develop the play to look off safeties, when he comes back to his primary receiver, if it's there, pull the trigger and if it's not take what you can get on the ground. It's what they asked him to do as a freshman, and it worked very well. I understand the desire to develop him into a pocket QB that can go through progressions, but I just don't believe he has the physical gifts to deliver the ball on time to secondary receivers in the face of pressure.
The stubbornness of Meyer at this point, can and should be called out IMO. It's really frustrating to watch teams develop designed plays to execute against our defense (OU's RB/FB seam route play, the TE slip screens, etc).....in comparison to our "system" offense where JT is being asked to read the defense and make progressions....it's just frustrating. Take some of the decision-making/complexity out of the offense, and get back to physical JT Barrett who fights for the extra 2 or 3 yards, and set-up play-action off of power football.......the Tebow offense.
And if you want a system QB who is being asked to make reads and go through a route tree, maybe it's time to look another direction and see what Haskins/Burrow are capable of. Haskins has an NFL arm....Burrow lacks arm-strength, although I believe it's stronger than Barrett's.
It's frustrating to look back on, but even Kenny Guiton was humming back in 2013 with 14 TD throws to 2 picks in limited action, and close to a 70% completion percentage. He had less arm strength than Barrett but the plays were designed for him to get the ball out quickly, and he distributed it well.
We're just lost right now, and I believe a large portion of it is, this stubborn desire to make Barrett something he isn't....
I made the statement during the Indiana game, that I'd prefer they go back to a "Tebow-esque" offense around Barrett. Give him 1 read on pass plays, develop the play to look off safeties, when he comes back to his primary receiver, if it's there, pull the trigger and if it's not take what you can get on the ground. It's what they asked him to do as a freshman, and it worked very well. I understand the desire to develop him into a pocket QB that can go through progressions, but I just don't believe he has the physical gifts to deliver the ball on time to secondary receivers in the face of pressure.
The stubbornness of Meyer at this point, can and should be called out IMO. It's really frustrating to watch teams develop designed plays to execute against our defense (OU's RB/FB seam route play, the TE slip screens, etc).....in comparison to our "system" offense where JT is being asked to read the defense and make progressions....it's just frustrating. Take some of the decision-making/complexity out of the offense, and get back to physical JT Barrett who fights for the extra 2 or 3 yards, and set-up play-action off of power football.......the Tebow offense.
And if you want a system QB who is being asked to make reads and go through a route tree, maybe it's time to look another direction and see what Haskins/Burrow are capable of. Haskins has an NFL arm....Burrow lacks arm-strength, although I believe it's stronger than Barrett's.
It's frustrating to look back on, but even Kenny Guiton was humming back in 2013 with 14 TD throws to 2 picks in limited action, and close to a 70% completion percentage. He had less arm strength than Barrett but the plays were designed for him to get the ball out quickly, and he distributed it well.
We're just lost right now, and I believe a large portion of it is, this stubborn desire to make Barrett something he isn't....
Upvote
0