• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Game Thread Ohio State vs Michigan State, 11/11/17 @ 12:00 ET (FOX)

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Sort by date Sort by votes
Why does it seem like there is still no discussion of looking at the Targeting rule?

It's crazy how essentially EVERYONE hates the rule and yet seems nothing is even going to be looked at. They need to distinguish between incidental contact and head-hunting. At the very least they need to review it and if it looks incidental, treat it like basketball. Flagrant 1 is a warning and 15 yd penalty, flagrant 2 is automatic ejection like they have.
 
Upvote 0
melecoaze said:
True but JT is usually very conservative with his passing. I don't think we can ask him to be a gunslinger and be successful. He was in the Penn State game but that doesn't mean he should always be.
Click to expand...

It's a coaching decision. I've harped on about it all year, since I believed JT could make the throws but was being held back by needlessly conservative playcalling (Urban emphasizes avoiding turnovers).

Based on last week and this week, the coaches might have had a reason to be conservative.
 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top