• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Game Thread Ohio State at Wisconsin, 10/15/16, 8:00pm ET ABC/WatchESPN

After sleeping on it here's what I have further...

1. I think UFM has made the arms race in the big ten ridiculous. It was laughable when Urban first got here and now teams seem to have better athletes and more importantly have an idea how to attack us to give themselves a shot. The big ten is neck and neck with the SEC and if not for Bama I'd say the big ten is far better.

2. Our passing game actually was fairly good yesterday. Brown had a drop early, Samuel had a drop for 6, and so did McLaurin. That would have made JT 20 for 27 for over 300 easily. Not to mention that pick was just a result of a wet ball for the 2 minutes it rained yesterday. He was wide open and had the right idea but missed high by 5 yards.

3. Zone 6 is getting smaller I noticed. McLaurin, Campbell (who I thought was outstanding), Brown and Wilson were leaned on. Clark and Hill came in some as well but not as much as they normally had been.

4. We really need to have a better idea of how to use Weber/Samuel. I love weber off tackle with a pulling guard I think he's a lot to handle outside the tackles and last night was no different. Meanwhile we thought just quickly shoving the ball to Samuel and asking him to outrun everyone was the answer.

Weber is the running back straight up. JT is just as effective as Weber as well but with Samuel I'd like to see more of him in the slot and either taking those quick swing passes (where have those been all year?) OR motioning into the backfield to go off tackle with weber as a lead blocker. Im not a fan of subbing 25 for 4.

5. I chalk Wisconsin's success up to using their off weak masterfully. They knew who to pick on through the air(Arnette and Webb) but I blame osu for their success on the ground.

I said it in the off season and I'm saying it again. When a team lines up with a fullback, a tight end, a massive online, and a big running back its not enough to be quick and fast. We are light in the front 7 and we are under sized at safety as well. Our front 4 starts 3 defensive ends and a DT, our backers start a converted safety and Baker who's probably not 220 pounds and finally Webb isn't 200 pounds as well.

When push came to shove we had trouble setting the LOS and just as I thought would happen. We were willing to drop 8 or 9 into the box but I really think this staff needs to find a way to put another big body out there when facing this sort of offense. Especially if Booker comes back because that gives us another 240 pound guy who's actually fast.

Just as we do when a team spreads us out when we go to nickel we must have a heavy package or that scum game will be an up hill battle to win. We have the best secondary in the nation I'm convinced of that and our objective at all costs should be to absolutely take away their running game and if it means putting 8 in the box and rolling with a 4-4 defense then you do it.

6. I think Webb will be solid in time but right now he's not playing well enough. That TD was on him, and he gave up the long pass play to their tight end a few times. I'd really like to see what Smithe can do. He was a ball hawk last time he was playing regularly
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
Possibly. Unfortunately Nebraska has the inside track on the West, but they also have to come to Camp Randall in two weeks. That'll be a big one.

If both Wiscy and OSU beat Corn and there are no upsets, Wiscy goes to Indy, right?

Nebraska has the inside track but I wouldn't forget Iowa, they only have 1 B1G loss.

Bucky has to overcome the post SuperBowl blues and go play at Iowa next week. Teams don't usually do very well with that.

Iowa also gets Nebraska in Iowa City. If you assume OSU hangs a loss on Nebraska and Nowrthwestern for them then Iowa can still control their own destiny even with an assumed 2nd B1G loss to scUM.
 
Upvote 0
Wisconsin is going to tear Nebraska a new ass hole
I'm pretty confident Wisconsin wins that game comfortably. It's another night game at Camp Randall, and Wisconsin just has Nebraska's number in those situations since they joined the conference. The Iowa game next week concerns me more as, like Jax said, there could be a hangover effect in play there.
 
Upvote 0
I'm pretty confident Wisconsin wins that game comfortably. It's another night game at Camp Randall, and Wisconsin just has Nebraska's number in those situations since they joined the conference. The Iowa game next week concerns me more as, like Jax said, there could be a hangover effect in play there.

Also, Iowa may be mediocre, but they're not soft. Nebraska's soft until they prove that they're not. Wiscy typically eats soft for breakfast.
 
Upvote 0
Last night was the first time I was really aware that this team doesn't have Tracy Sprinkle on it.

We are extremely desperate for experience and size at the DT position. McMillian can only come crashing down to help so much. We are extremely fortunate to have so much talent on the edge, but the inside is getting gashed and is a clear weakness.

If you play Ohio state, it's simple to figure out: Continue rushing up the middle until you get the safety and Linebackers to cheat down, then toss it to the outside or on a slant over the middle depending on what the linebacker trends are. It's simple and effective. Wisconsin used it perfectly.
 
Upvote 0
Last night was the first time I was really aware that this team doesn't have Tracy Sprinkle on it.

We are extremely desperate for experience and size at the DT position. McMillian can only come crashing down to help so much. We are extremely fortunate to have so much talent on the edge, but the inside is getting gashed and is a clear weakness.

If you play Ohio state, it's simple to figure out: Continue rushing up the middle until you get the safety and Linebackers to cheat down, then toss it to the outside or on a slant over the middle depending on what the linebacker trends are. It's simple and effective. Wisconsin used it perfectly.
Yep these are the games where we miss a Tracy Sprinkle.
 
Upvote 0
Last night was the first time I was really aware that this team doesn't have Tracy Sprinkle on it.

We are extremely desperate for experience and size at the DT position. McMillian can only come crashing down to help so much. We are extremely fortunate to have so much talent on the edge, but the inside is getting gashed and is a clear weakness.

If you play Ohio state, it's simple to figure out: Continue rushing up the middle until you get the safety and Linebackers to cheat down, then toss it to the outside or on a slant over the middle depending on what the linebacker trends are. It's simple and effective. Wisconsin used it perfectly.

But that's not how they got their yards. They hardly got them running up the middle. They got them by out-flanking the boundary end who has to maintain leverage himself with stretch plays and off-tackles. And it wasn't all bad, after Clement had 7 carries for 97 yards in the 1st quarter, he had 18 for just 67 after that.
 
Upvote 0
But that's not how they got their yards. They hardly got them running up the middle. They got them by out-flanking the boundary end who has to maintain leverage himself with stretch plays and off-tackles. And it wasn't all bad, after Clement had 7 carries for 97 yards in the 1st quarter, he had 18 for just 67 after that.

I really think that most of the trouble was simply a matter of a young defense being flummoxed for a bit against the previously not played against tight formations that Wiscy runs. With just about everybody lined up inside the hashes, the distances and angles for getting to the boundary changed, and Wiscy also did a good job of initial preparation to exploit specific formation-created mismatches. Once the coaches got the D adjusted, it mostly did well excluding Wiscy's one second half TD drive, and even drive that required a perfect 3d down long ball to get them started.
 
Upvote 0
I really think that most of the trouble was simply a matter of a young defense being flummoxed for a bit against the previously not played against tight formations that Wiscy runs. With just about everybody lined up inside the hashes, the distances and angles for getting to the boundary changed, and Wiscy also did a good job of initial preparation to exploit specific formation-created mismatches. Once the coaches got the D adjusted, it mostly did well excluding Wiscy's one second half TD drive, and even drive that required a perfect 3d down long ball to get them started.

Yeah, you could see the shifts that they were making was confusing the front 7. They did a good job of motioning and shifting, which was changing gap responsibility and the young Bucks were slow to pick up on it. Once the adjustments were made they did a lot better of slowing the run game down.
 
Upvote 0
Score first, Bosa sack to end it. You're welcome bitch!
mqdefault.jpg
Well played sir, well played.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top