Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
EidoloN;1249420; said:And this is why I have a problem with USC. Not the football team, as they have proven themselves, but their fans. Most of them (that I have met) are ignorant and blind when it comes to talking football. They make no solid argument to me except, "we are gonna kill you", and "the Bucks have NO chance". Please at least give me a competitive argument, do they even know who the USC's previous coach was? Not at all. They have been blessed is recent years, but stop being so damn blind to the fact that, hey, we are pretty damn good team too!
Kurt Sexington;1249682; said:I think the undoing of the Buckeyes in the last two year's BCS title games was that the opposing defense put constant, unrelenting pressure on both Boeckman and Smith and neither could find a rythmn at any time in the game.
troy#1;1249642; said:Reminds me of a song from the 80"s, "cant touch this!"
Columbus chapter of Buckeye Nation already focused on USC
Email Picture
Matthew Emmons / US PresswireBuckeye faithful probably will be out in full force Saturday when No. 2-ranked Ohio State plays Ohio, but almost everyone around Columbus, Ohio, is talking about next week's game against top-ranked USC.
[COLOR=#333333! important]Ohio State has a game Saturday against Ohio, but all the buzz locally is about next week's game against No. 1-ranked Trojans. As fans look ahead, it's hard for players not to do the same.[/COLOR]
[COLOR=#999999! important]By David Wharton, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
5:30 PM PDT, September 5, 2008 [/COLOR]
COLUMBUS, Ohio -- The old football coach flashes a look of incredulity, wincing, like you just don't understood.
So you try again: Is the USC game really that important to Ohio State fans?
Continued.......
jmorbitz;1249910; said:I have a feeling this will be the catalyst in this game, both teams can run the ball, but the receivers have not stood out substantially, IMHO, for either team, not that they aren't very good, it's just that no one has really separated themselves from the pack.
[sarcasm]Don't eat me alive[/sarcasm]
Kurt Sexington;1249941; said:Interesting point. Robo and Hartline didnt really impress me in the game vs YState but I know what they are capable of. As for USC, the two receivers who did impress me (Rojo and Damian Williams) arent even supposed to be starting or at least werent after camp if Im not mistaken. As a USC fan, this obviously concerns me because neither Rojo or Williams are proven commodities at receiver. These guys arent Smith and Jarrett or Ginn and Gonzalez types that can basically guarantee production and if the USC receivers just shut down come the 13th, that's a serious, serious problem.
As far as tOSU, the needed production of Hartline, Robiskie et al. is pretty crucial or else USC will start covering the OSU WRs one on one and stack the box. If I were Tressell (and PC, for that matter) I would get it through my receivers head early that no matter how tough the coverage is and no matter how hard the hits come accross the middle, they HAVE to drag in some balls in the early going and show the opposing secondary that they are there to produce.
We have all seen teams whose WRs just didnt show up and these games can get UGLY, fast.
Kurt Sexington;1249941; said:Hartline didnt really impress me in the game vs YState
Kurt Sexington;1249941; said:As for USC, the two receivers who did impress me (Rojo and Damian Williams) arent even supposed to be starting or at least werent after camp if Im not mistaken. As a USC fan, this obviously concerns me because neither Rojo or Williams are proven commodities at receiver.