In my mind, it is not about one performance. Te'o was terribly over-hyped by the press and got badly exposed in the NCG, as was his team.
As an example of the hype, at one point in the NCG broadcast, Musberger was talking about how "A LOT of those interceptions" made by Te'o came from tipped balls, emphasizing the words "A LOT". Would that be three, four interceptions, all seven, Brent? Is that really a lot? More than 100 tackles is "a lot", but Te'o wasn't near the top 20 in any other metric this year.
I'm not saying that he was not an excellent linebacker in college football. I'm saying that we should look a bit deeper.
Notre Dame played a decent schedule, but they played only two teams with less than five losses.
Both of those teams (Stanford and Oklahoma) were badly exposed in their bowl games. Neither of those teams were really physical teams.
It's easy to look good on defense behind all that hype. Even someone who is not really a physical player. Even someone who sometimes has trouble getting off blocks.
Look beyond the tackles and interceptions, and what one sees is an excellent linebacker but not someone who deserved to leave college football as its most decorated player. Evidence suggests that he may not even be a standout in the NFL.
We also see evidence about this kid that tells a pretty good story--one that we would celebrate for an Ohio State player--if one looks at the kid in a more balanced way.
Comes back for his senior year. Handles the loss of his grandmother and girlfriend on same day. Never gets in trouble for alcohol- or drug-related problems. Doesn't get into any brawls or sexually-abuse any girls. Keeps himself academically-eligible. Provides leadership in a defense that played way above historical expectations.
I'm not sure how he did academically or if he finished his degree, but this is a kid who did it the right way and I hope he will have success in life.