Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
IronBuckI;1347428; said:Everyone also needs to remember that I did turn injuries back on, so don't fall in love too much with one player, especially a running QB. You might just get him broken.
I target no more than 20 guys in both dynasties anyway. I can usually get a couple of early commits and then go hunting again later in the season. Not having injuries turned on last season didn't affect my recruiting, because it was just an experiment. What it did do was affect how I played the guys that I did have in place, and I didn't like that. LeFevour ran a lot more than I would have run him, even with the decent senior backup that I had. I also didn't pull my starters when games got out of hand.Piney;1347493; said:Yeah, that was a bitch you turned them back on. But you had to or else someone (ie me) could have really took advantage of that. Cuz it would have affected recruiting.
Imagine... no injuries... so you now don't need depth. So you only need 1 stud at every position. Like a person like me having a 90 speed QB, I don't need to really recruit a QB for 1-2 years. You have a stud frosh RB? No need to bother wasting time recruiting crappy RBs. Recruiting would be cherry picking... only targeting 10-15 guys period and pouring all your time on each of those guys. Someone could have easily have taken advantage of that
I had planned on not recruiting a QB since no need to have depth. But now... damn you... I have to recruit one or two since I have like 5 senior QBs.
I like it for now, but you have to have a good runner at FB. I've only run it in practice games agaisnt Kansas and WVU. I beat the hell out of both teams with it, but they're B or B- rated teams that are being controlled by the CPU. I'm really interested to see how well it works against a human opponent. Especially against a human that's good against the run, like You, fanatic, and BN27 were against me last season. I threw all over the place against BN27, but couldn't run worth a [censored] vs. any of you guys. There are no shotgun formations except for Hail Mary. That's fine with me though, because I'm light on WR talent anyway. The Option Run playbook probably has better formations, but I'm committed to the flexbone, and I'm going to stick with it all season, no matter how painful.Piney;1347493; said:Now back to option football... You like the Georgia Tech playbook? That is one thing I have to do is find a playbook I really like that can give me my option football along with the passing attack I want to supplement. Cuz in the human games I really fear the option attack can be neutralized. And I don't want to cheese by running my QB out of passing plays all the time.
IronBuckI;1347516; said:I like it for now, but you have to have a good runner at FB. I've only run it in practice games agaisnt Kansas and WVU. I beat the hell out of both teams with it, but they're B or B- rated teams that are being controlled by the CPU. I'm really interested to see how well it works against a human opponent. Especially against a human that's good against the run, like You, fanatic, and BN27 were against me last season. I threw all over the place against BN27, but couldn't run worth a [censored] vs. any of you guys. There are no shotgun formations except for Hail Mary. That's fine with me though, because I'm light on WR talent anyway. The Option Run playbook probably has better formations, but I'm committed to the flexbone, and I'm going to stick with it all season, no matter how painful.
I think that I've figured out your INT problem. You read a defense as well as Vince Young. I ran a base defense against you, but I rarely rushed more than four. I thought you were going to bust out the option at anytime, and wanted to keep everything in front of me. Lots of cover 2 and a few zone blitzes, but I probably only used the 46 defense a handfull of plays in that game, and don't think that I used the 1-5-5 nickel at all.Piney;1347542; said:You weren't able to run on BN? I ran all over him (or at least when I wanted to)
But the threat of the pass against humans is key to be able to run. I couldn't pass last year as my WRs were [censored]. You loaded the box against me but my WRs couldn't make you pay.
IronBuckI;1347575; said:I think that I've figured out your INT problem. You read a defense as well as Vince Young. I ran a base defense against you,
BuckeyeNation27;1347641; said:Also, Piney, fuck you.