• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

NCAA punishes USC - Reggie Bush, OJ Mayo, Dwayne Jarrett, Joe McKnight investigation

Racketeering: 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1961, 1962

CHAPTER 96--RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS

Sec. 1961. Definitions

As used in this chapter--
(1) ``racketeering activity'' means (A) any act or threat
involving murder, kidnapping, gambling, arson, robbery, bribery,
extortion, dealing in obscene matter, or dealing in a controlled
substance or listed chemical (as defined in section 102 of the
Controlled Substances Act), which is chargeable under State law and
punishable by imprisonment for more than one year; (B) any act which
is indictable under any of the following provisions of title 18,
United States Code: Section 201 (relating to bribery), section 224
(relating to sports bribery), sections 471, 472, and 473 (relating
to counterfeiting), section 659 (relating to theft from interstate
shipment) if the act indictable under section 659 is felonious,
section 664 (relating to embezzlement from pension and welfare
funds), sections 891-894 (relating to extortionate credit
transactions), section 1029 (relating to fraud and related activity
in connection with access devices), section 1084 (relating to the
transmission of gambling information), section 1341 (relating to
mail fraud), section 1343 (relating to wire fraud), section 1344
(relating to financial institution fraud), sections 1461-1465
(relating to obscene matter), section 1503 (relating to obstruction
of justice), section 1510 (relating to obstruction of criminal
investigations), section 1511 (relating to the obstruction of State
or local law enforcement), section 1512 (relating to tampering with
a witness, victim, or an informant), section 1513 (relating to
retaliating against a witness, victim, or an informant), section
1951 (relating to interference with commerce, robbery, or
extortion), section 1952 (relating to racketeering), section 1953
(relating to interstate transportation of wagering paraphernalia),
section 1954 (relating to unlawful welfare fund payments), section
1955 (relating to the prohibition of illegal gambling businesses),
section 1956 (relating to the laundering of monetary instruments),
section 1957 (relating to engaging in monetary transactions in
property derived from specified unlawful activity), section 1958
(relating to use of interstate commerce facilities in the commission
of murder-for-hire), sections 2251, 2251A, 2252, and 2258 (relating
to sexual exploitation of children), sections 2312 and 2313
(relating to interstate transportation of stolen motor vehicles),
sections 2314 and 2315 (relating to interstate transportation of
stolen property), section 2321 (relating to trafficking in certain
motor vehicles or motor vehicle parts), sections 2341-2346 (relating
to trafficking in contraband cigarettes), sections 2421-24 (relating
to white slave traffic), (C) any act which is indictable under title
29, United States Code, section 186 (dealing with restrictions on
payments and loans to labor organizations) or section 501(c)
(relating to embezzlement from union funds), (D) any offense
involving fraud connected with a case under title 11 (except a case
under section 157 of that \1\ title), fraud in the sale of
securities, or the felonious manufacture, importation, receiving,
concealment, buying, selling, or otherwise dealing in a controlled
substance or listed chemical (as defined in section 102 of the
Controlled Substances Act), punishable under any law of the United
States, or (E) any act which is indictable under the Currency and
Foreign Transactions Reporting Act.

AND:

Sec. 1962. Prohibited activities

(a) It shall be unlawful for any person who has received any income
derived, directly or indirectly, from a pattern of racketeering activity
or through collection of an unlawful debt in which such person has
participated as a principal within the meaning of section 2, title 18,
United States Code, to use or invest, directly or indirectly, any part
of such income, or the proceeds of such income, in acquisition of any
interest in, or the establishment or operation of, any enterprise which
is engaged in, or the activities of which affect, interstate or foreign
commerce. A purchase of securities on the open market for purposes of
investment, and without the intention of controlling or participating in
the control of the issuer, or of assisting another to do so, shall not
be unlawful under this subsection if the securities of the issuer held
by the purchaser, the members of his immediate family, and his or their
accomplices in any pattern or racketeering activity or the collection of
an unlawful debt after such purchase do not amount in the aggregate to
one percent of the outstanding securities of any one class, and do not
confer, either in law or in fact, the power to elect one or more
directors of the issuer.
(b) It shall be unlawful for any person through a pattern of
racketeering activity or through collection of an unlawful debt to
acquire or maintain, directly or indirectly, any interest in or control
of any enterprise which is engaged in, or the activities of which
affect, interstate or foreign commerce.
(c) It shall be unlawful for any person employed by or associated
with any enterprise engaged in, or the activities of which affect,
interstate or foreign commerce, to conduct or participate, directly or
indirectly, in the conduct of such enterprise's affairs through a
pattern of racketeering activity or collection of unlawful debt.
(d) It shall be unlawful for any person to conspire to violate any
of the provisions of subsection (a), (b), or (c) of this section.

Just a possibility - I can't say for certain what the FBI is doing there. I guess I should also say, Section 224 (Sports Bribery) deals more with fixing games... it COULD be implicated here, but for all I know, COULD also be unlikely. That is, I don't see any evidence that Bush was compelled to throw any games (Unless it was the Rose, which I doubt)
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
Should have expanded my earlier response: FBI involved because of alleged crime under Title 18, U.S. Code. Agree, fraud most likely. FBI, to start inquiry would have presented case to U.S. Attorney to coordinate and essentially get approval to open an investigation.
 
Upvote 0
And, what hides underneath the cloud of Bush family refusing to be interviewed by NCAA or Pac10? 5th Amend.? My guess is, this is the reason FBI has been brought into case.

The NCAA has very limited power to force anyone to talk. Their biggest source of leverage is that they can declare you ineligible if you don't cooperate. Obviously that wouldn't matter to an athlete who has already forfeited his eligibility to go pro.

The FBI is not going to step in on the NCAA's behalf. The FBI investigation may ultimately help the NCAA, but the FBI has its own motives.
 
Upvote 0
thats a lot of B.S.
OSU gets hammered cause of that anti/osu stuff in the media for a few years and then the booster/smith thing is considered a bigger violation.

No kidding. That's a good point with the media. I haven't heard anything about the Bush situation in while, and I'm sure the NCAA will just gloss over the Bush situation even though a 5 year old could tell you that a violation of the rules occurred.
 
Upvote 0
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=2486792

It appears (if you're willing to take Petey's word) that Jarrett won't even have to sit out one game, even though the NCAA ruled that he violated a rule. Let's see: TS took $500 from a booster one time and sat out 2 games, whereas Jarrett essentially took over $1,200 PER MONTH and he will not have to sit out any games. That's fair. :roll1:

Taking cash in an envelope from a stranger has a different feel to it than having your roommate/teammate's dad pick up part of the rent. Besides, the NCAA is nothing if not unpredictable.
 
Upvote 0
Different feel to it but not all that much different.

Does Steinbrenner have a kid? Let's say we give him a scholarship and let Big Stein spend some money on the team.

That is also a different set of circumstances from what happened here. Leinart was the star player (Heisman winner), not some reserve. And Leinart came from a middle class family.

The Steinbrenner situation you mentioned might have happened at Missouri. Josh Kroenke was a reserve bball player whose father Stan Kroenke owns the Denver Nuggets and several other pro teams. Former Missouri player Linas Kleiza just happens to play for the Nuggets now. Small world.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top