10 National writers weigh in on Reggie.
CFN
They talk about how programs should be punished.
CFN
CFN
They talk about how programs should be punished.
CFN
. Keeping the NCAA’s rules in mind, in general, what would you do to punish offending programs?
Pete Fiutak, CFN : Make the schools give the bowl money back that was earned by using an offending player, and don’t allow them to take any money for bowl appearances for two years (depending on the offense). Unless you’re Notre Dame, having to write a $10 million check would be really, really painful.
Reggie Bush played for USC, USC won those games, and he won the Heisman. You can try to take that all away with an *, or a keystroke, or an eraser, or a vote by a group of self-righteous blowhards, but the bell can’t be unrung. It’s ridiculous to punish this year’s USC team for the school’s past sins; Matt Barkley and the crew shouldn’t be denied an opportunity to play for a national title just because Bush was being naughty. Let USC go to a bowl, but the payout should go to the other teams in the Pac 10. USC would then be making money for UCLA, Oregon, and the rest of its conference rivals.
Richard Cirminiello, CFN : Obviously, it depends on the severity of the infraction. Assuming cheating is involved, you’ve got to hit a coaching staff and a program where it hurts most and limit their number of scholarships. Nothing is more damning or sends a stronger message than shrinking the talent pool and tying the coach’s hands in February.
Matt Zemek, CFN: Well, for starters, the rules - written and unwritten - need to be clearly laid down and then consistently applied. Everyone needs to be aware of and then be punished in accordance with the same standards across the board. The other key thing to do is to place punishments on the shoulders of the college presidents, athletic directors and coaches, the people who - at least at this point in time - are the only people who can tuck away take-home pay in the college sports industry. Punishing the 2010 and 2011 USC football players makes no sense, just to give one example. Punish the bejeezus out of Mike Garrett and Steven Sample. Also, punish Pete Carroll.
Dennis Dodd, CBSSports.com: Sue the offending coaches and players for damages after the fact. If the NCAA doesn't do it, an affected school like USC or a private individual(s) should do it. That brings up another question: Why is Reggie Bush being allowed to help USC with its appeal? Shouldn't the school be disassociating itself from Bush?
Verne Lundquist, CBS : If the football program is found cheating, I'd punish them in the manner to which we've grown accustomed: bowl game ban, reduced scholarships, etc. I'd also keep them off television because exposure on the tube is the life blood of the recruiting process. I can hear my bosses at CBS breathing abnormally because having big time football programs on the air on Saturday afternoons is the reason the network is willing to pay those huge rights fees. What I would not do is administer the 'death penalty'. Google 'SMU football'.
Joe Schad, ESPN : 1) Forget vacating of win-loss records, that's pointless. 2) Take personal records away. 3) Take even more scholarships away. 4) Suspend the coaches who were involved, if they were
Last edited:
Upvote
0