Yeah, fixing a value has never sat well with me. Especially since it's a two way proposition. The community's value is in its core users and regular posters (past and present), so I've always tried to make it clear that money isn't the only way to help the site.
None of this is about the site making more money. It really came down to thinking about what it would take/be worth to get rid of the ads.
Maybe I'm thinking about it the wrong way. Maybe donors simply don't have to see ads the month they donate anything, and for multiple months for every multiple of X, where X is still very modest. I've always wanted to figure out how to incentivize more to give less (@jwinslow -- I'm not sure where the efficiency cut off is with PayPal but there are other vehicles these days including Bitcoin) and maybe that's a way to do it. And for those who already give and don't do it for any other reason than they value the site, it's a nice little perk.
None of this is about the site making more money. It really came down to thinking about what it would take/be worth to get rid of the ads.
Maybe I'm thinking about it the wrong way. Maybe donors simply don't have to see ads the month they donate anything, and for multiple months for every multiple of X, where X is still very modest. I've always wanted to figure out how to incentivize more to give less (@jwinslow -- I'm not sure where the efficiency cut off is with PayPal but there are other vehicles these days including Bitcoin) and maybe that's a way to do it. And for those who already give and don't do it for any other reason than they value the site, it's a nice little perk.
Upvote
0