If you've uploaded photos of yourself to Facebook or really anywhere online at all, there is already plenty online for AI to run with
Upvote
0
-
New here? Register here now for access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Plus, stay connected and follow BP on Instagram @buckeyeplanet and Facebook.
- Thread starter Tomateaux Quinoa Gumbeaux
- Start date
DubCoffman62
Lazy Slob
There's a website called Pimeyes that uses facial recognition software to find and pictures of any face that's been uploaded onto any site other than social media sites like Facebook and it's scary accurate. I used it to help a lady friend find a naughty video her ex uploaded onto a porn site 5 years ago. Also and old pictures you may have uploaded onto any site that's still active can easily be found.
Upvote
0
Yeah. I kicked it around with a couple people yesterday and all I succeeded in doing was making people uncomfortable, lol. I did look at Ohio's child porn statute which contemplates imagery showing a "minor or impaired person." While there's still the issue of there not being a real life victim, I wonder if a prosecutor may be able to utilize this caveat:
R.C. 2907.322(B)(3).
If a jury infers that an image of an underage or impaired person is a minor owing to the "visual representation" or whatnot I think a conviction could result despite there being no human victim. On the other hand, the images aren't created out of thin air... which is to say, couldn't the argument be made that the AI created image has uncounted victims?
That’s what I was thinking about these cases, seems like the prosecutors need to prove that the ai image was based on the images of an underage girl.
However here’s a possible grey area imo. It’s one thing to take the face of a person, but if the aspects of the naked body is not of coming from that person, would it still count as underage nudity?
As creepy as it is, I don’t think it’s considered illegal CP just to have a folder full of high school year book photos, so I wonder if they need to determine there being underage body parts represented in the nude to make a case. For instance if someone took some girls face and put it on 90s Pamela Anderson’s body? The body would be of a voluptuous grown woman, but the face of a girl. What would a jury likely conclude there?
Upvote
0
Neither is the internet itself. For those of you old enough, remember when we thought the web would be mankind's greatest achievement? Instantly sharing the world's knowledge around the globe? The possibilities were endless. Now I envision Tim Berners-Lee sitting in a dirty old recliner, sporting a 3 day growth of beard and a torn t shirt, an ashtray full of butts next to him and a bottle of cheap whiskey in his hand while muttering over and over to himself "What the fuck did I do"?
Al gore is a fucking dickhead
In seriousness it seems the more technically advanced the Internet gets, the worse it gets.
Al Gore invented condoms.
Police launch the first investigation into 'virtual rape'
The girl under the age of 16 is said to have been left distraught after her avatar - her digital character - was gang raped by the online strangers.www.dailymail.co.uk
1. How is there even sex, let alone rape?
2. Just take the headset off and walk away.
I suspect it is, or maybe a slightly lesser crime.
I'm absolutely certain we've already addressed loopholes like "adults pretending to be underage children".
Then again Hollywood routinely depicts 16yr olds having sex with 22yr old actors so... maybe im wrong.
Upvote
0