BB73;1303051; said:
I agree with all of this. But to be clear, I don't think he meant to hit Garcia until the last second. In the early part of the play, he was properly positioning himself to be outside the play and looking toward the middle of the field. Then Garcia broke it outside, and ended up close to the umpire. At that point, some old instincts kicked in and he delivered a hit.
I don't think he should be fired, but I think the SEC should fine and/or suspend him to indicate that such actions by officials are unacceptable.
Sorry, Bill. He's not supposed to move there. The more he moves around, the more he's going to get in the way.
The umpire is supposed to stay in his spot until the last split second, so the players can avoid him.
He's not responsible for being "outside the play" - ever.
Having said that, this ref simply
has to be investigated by the SEC, and suspended until investigation is concluded.
If he was stationary, and the ball carrier made a cut right into him, then I would definitely see it as a self-defensive reaction to throw the shoulder.
This guy
1. Was initially turned to the inside of the field
2. When the QB reversed field, the Umpire locked onto him with his eyes (not necessarily a good thing to do), then squared up to the ball carrier (a necessary thing).
3. Then he shuffled down the line all the while locked onto the ball carrier. This move makes no sense whatsoever from an umpire's standpoint. He should have kept rotating his body to the outside if the play went that way.
4. He then steps forward and into the ballcarrier to
initiate contact that would otherwise have been avoided.
In 40 years of watching football, and coaching sports since 1983, and having done some officiating (basketball) myself, I have
never, ever seen anything wuite like this.
Remember when Earl the Pearl Monroe got a rebound, turned and shot the ball into the opponent's basket? THAT was more defensable as a "brain-cramp" moment than what this ref did. Of course, they investigated Monroe and found out that he had made that basket to cover the spread, and that he was heavily involved in gambling.
Either this referee is:
a) crooked
b) incompetent to where he shouldn't be out there at the Div I college level
c) if he truly had a "player flashback" moment, then he either shouldn't be officiating, or should be given a different assignment where he can't physically influence play.
Still, he's way better tahn most Big 10 refs :(