• New here? Register here now for access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Plus, stay connected and follow BP on Instagram @buckeyeplanet and Facebook.

Loser reporter asks Jim Calhoun about his salary....

I give Jim Calhoun some credit here, he could have been a lot worse; just imagine how Bob Knight would have answered that reporter's question.

afplivetwo352697-basket-nba.jpg


:slappy:
 
Upvote 0
DaytonBuck;1415203; said:
Wouldn't UConn have the same profile as Rhode Island or UMass if it wasn't for him?

I think Geno Auriemma would have something to say about that, though I won't even begin to argue that his impact can approach what takes place with a halfway decent men's team or football team.
 
Upvote 0
sepia5;1415069; said:
Everyone keeps saying the question is "not ok in that forum." Just what forum do you expect someone to pose the question to a head bball coach? Do you think Calhoun is giving roundtables on the economic crisis in Connecticut?

As jwins said, Calhoun isn't the party at whom this guy should direct his question. It's whomever at UConn decided it was a good idea for the university to sign the contract currently in place with Calhoun.

By the way, the decision of whether entering into the contract made sense for the university goes way beyond profit and loss for the athletic department. And the people making that decision are more aware of, and undoubtedly considered, all of those issues, unlike this clown whose analysis apparently consisted of, "Is $1.6 million a lot of money for a sports coach? I think so, in my sole opinion. Therefore, I'm going to make a scene at that coach's press conference." The analysis is nowhere near as simple as this dude apparently thought it was.
 
Upvote 0
Steve19;1414803; said:
We're sports fans. Sports fans generally feel like coaches are worth what they get paid.

But when major universities, such as Arizona State, are asking faculty and staff to take 13 unpaid working days this semester and Calhoun is getting what a dozen assistant professors get paid, we cab expect more questions about salaries.

The reporter is asking the wrong person the question. It is not the coaches fault that he gets paid what he does. The question should be asked of the AD, the president of the University and the Trustees....

Darn, jwins beat me to it.....
 
Upvote 0
buckeyesin07;1415299; said:
As jwins said, Calhoun isn't the party at whom this guy should direct his question. It's whomever at UConn decided it was a good idea for the university to sign the contract currently in place with Calhoun.

By the way, the decision of whether entering into the contract made sense for the university goes way beyond profit and loss for the athletic department. And the people making that decision are more aware of, and undoubtedly considered, all of those issues, unlike this clown whose analysis apparently consisted of, "Is $1.6 million a lot of money for a sports coach? I think so, in my sole opinion. Therefore, I'm going to make a scene at that coach's press conference." The analysis is nowhere near as simple as this dude apparently thought it was.

So I guess your position is not that it's the wrong forum, it's that the question shouldn't be asked to Calhoun. I was, of course, addressing the forum argument. Either way, I disagree entirely. As I said before, I think the question is fair game for all parties involved, Calhoun and those making the employment decisions. If, as is the case here in Connecticut, the Governor is proposing closing courthouses and eliminating hundreds of state jobs, and you're the highest paid employee in the state, the question is very relevant and I think it's fine to ask the person making that money and the people responsible for handing it out. In terms of Calhoun, the person making the money, where else would the question be posed directly?

Again, don't get me wrong. I think a strong argument can be made that Calhoun is worth the money, and I also think the "journalist" posed the question in an obviously confrontational manner and only wanted to make a scene (which is what Calhoun's response gave him). But to say the question isn't legitimate is wrong, IMO.
 
Upvote 0
Wingate1217;1415300; said:
The reporter is asking the wrong person the question. It is not the coaches fault that he gets paid what he does. The question should be asked of the AD, the president of the University and the Trustees....

Well, Calhoun DID sign the contract, too.:p

Not to say the "journalist" wasn't making an ass of himself. He was and that was his intent, I'm sure. But really, the problem isn't Uconn. It's systemic. If the question is going to be asked, it should be directed to every AD/President/Trustee AND the coaches.
 
Upvote 0
sepia5;1415316; said:
Again, don't get me wrong. I think a strong argument can be made that Calhoun is worth the money, and I also think the "journalist" posed the question in an obviously confrontational manner and only wanted to make a scene (which is what Calhoun's response gave him). But to say the question isn't legitimate is wrong, IMO.

I'm 100% with this. If a legitimate reporter broached this subject in a non-confrontational manner, I don't imagine this discussion would even be going on right now.
 
Upvote 0
Sadly, I think the only way to get an honest, unprepared response is to ask the question in this type of setting - in a well-attended public setting, with no forewarning. Can you imagine someone like Calhoun given his lawyer-prepared response? He would have used 50 words to say nothing.

If it were me in Calhoun's situation, I would have said that the market determined the appropriate compensation for a coach of my skills and abilities, and left it at that. I do think that coaches who are the highest paid state employees should be able to handle the burden of answering questions about their salaries. If the salaries are so easy to justify, then why get so defensive?

I haven't seen anyone else pick up on something else this reporter did - critique the other guys in the room, the mainstream sports media, for not asking the tough questions. It reminded me of something I just read in a wall street journal op ed piece on Nouriel Roubini regarding the financial crisis:

"The problem," he says -- after first stating to me that he intends "no offense!" -- "is that in the bubble years, everyone becomes a cheerleader, including the media. This is the time when journalists should be asking tough questions, and I think there was a failure there. The Masters of the Universe were always on the cover, or the front page -- the hedge-fund guys, the imperial CEO, private equity. I wish there had been more financial and business journalists, in the good years, who'd said, 'Wait a moment, if this man, or this firm, is making a 100% return a year, how do they do it? Is it because they're smarter than everybody else . . . or because they're taking so much risk they'll be bankrupt two years down the line?' "And I think, in the bubble years, no one asked the hard questions. A good journalist has to be one who, in good times, challenges the conventional wisdom. If you don't do that, you fail in one of your duties."
The bolded statement is one of the fundamental reasons we have a free press.
 
Upvote 0
JohnnyCockfight;1415381; said:
I haven't seen anyone else pick up on something else this reporter did - critique the other guys in the room, the mainstream sports media, for not asking the tough questions.

Ahem. . . .

sepia5;1415060; said:
This reporter is actually a free-lancer and political activist, so it's not like he has ties to the media establishment. In fact, during that press conference, the free-lancer actually said he wouldn't have to ask questions like that if "the rest of these guys," meaning the journalists in the room, asked the questions like they presumably should. To which the free-lancer was jeered by the other reporters. So I don't think Calhoun, despite his tirade (are these outbursts just the status quo with UCONN b-ball, by the way?), will have to worry about the press being too hard on him.
 
Upvote 0
BN27 may be onto something. Maybe Calhoun is an asshole.

Now BN27 probably has different reasons for his comment. And I don't necessarily think Calhoun is an asshole for the way he responded. Actually, the way he responded by getting angry shows that he, while getting very defensive by his salary, can't maintain a certain level of rational thought.

No, for me what has me thinking that Calhoun may be an asshole is his little quip about, "I want to retire someday" or something to that effect when poorly attempting to defend his salary.

After the 2004 NC season, Calhoun received a new six-year deal that pushed his contract through 2010. Calhoun's salary increased from $1.2 million in 2003-04 through 2007-08 to $1.6 million in 2008-09 and 2009-10.

I am sorry, when one makes $8 million over a 6-year period of time, stating that they "want to retire someday" in this economic situation (hell in any economic situation!) is moronic at best and being an insensitive asshole at worst.
 
Upvote 0
JohnnyCockfight;1415381; said:
I haven't seen anyone else pick up on something else this reporter did - critique the other guys in the room, the mainstream sports media, for not asking the tough questions. It reminded me of something I just read in a wall street journal op ed piece on Nouriel Roubini regarding the financial crisis:

The bolded statement is one of the fundamental reasons we have a free press.

The sports reporters were sent there to cover the game, and they probably had questions about the game. Not sure their editors and bosses would appreciate the sports journalists asking about Calhoun's salary.

The collective groan in the room was because the reporter was a fucking moron who not only asked an inappropriate question (IMO), but tried to insult everyone else in the room for doing their jobs.

Calhoun should have handled this better because he's representing a university and group of kids, but I don't have a problem with him being upset with the question.
 
Upvote 0
Bottom line is that if you want a bite out of Calhoun's salary, talk to the school administrators and trustees. Don't take a [censored] on a coach who's legally entitled to what he's earning and shame the guy. Calhoun basically told him that he's got nothing to be ashamed of, and he's got every right to say that.
 
Upvote 0
Tresselbeliever;1415646; said:
Bottom line is that if you want a bite out of Calhoun's salary, talk to the school administrators and trustees. Don't take a [censored] on a coach who's legally entitled to what he's earning and shame the guy. Calhoun basically told him that he's got nothing to be ashamed of, and he's got every right to say that.

I agree but I dislike him as a coach
 
Upvote 0
You know, I've thought about what Calhoun should have said, and I think this would have been interesting:

"I'll answer your question if you can answer a couple of mine correctly. First, name my entire starting lineup from today's game. Second, how many of the following defenses did my team use -- man to man, 1-3-1 zone, 2-3 zone, matchup zone or box-in one, and did we employ a full court or half court press at any point? If you can't answer those questions, then I would like to ask you to kindly refrain from attempting to cover basketball. Thank you."

That would be game, set, match for the activist journalist, methinks.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top