Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Onebuckfan;1950888; said:It won't be the first time someone was paid for silence..
ORD_Buckeye;1950890; said:Please. This does NOT legitimize the dearly sought hope on the part of many that JT really is a saint, that he did everything right and is only covering up (obviously out of good, noble saintly intentions) for Smith and Gee.
Quite the opposite since he's walking away (on water in the eyes of some) with a pittance of his contract. If his silence was worth anything and this was some attempt to buy it, he'd be getting a hell of a lot more than this.
Buckeye86;1950902; said:Woody is an Ohio State saint and he punched a kid in the face on the sidelines among many other incidents. You can object to and mock people who support Tressel all you want, but Tressel will be an Ohio State saint one day as well. You might as well get on the side of history and get over it.
Buckeye86;1950902; said:Woody is an Ohio State saint and he punched a kid in the face on the sidelines among many other incidents. You can object to and mock people who support Tressel all you want, but Tressel will be an Ohio State saint one day as well. You might as well get on the side of history and get over it.
Buckeye86;1950923; said:Time heals all wounds. Like I said, the sooner you get over it the sooner you'll be on the side of history.
Your suggestion that Woody didn't embarass the university by punching someone is laughable and perfectly proves my point.
Steve19;1950927; said:Woody Hayes and Jim Tressel are the two most successful coaches in the history of one of the most storied college football programs. Both developed players into men on the field and in the classroom. Both earned less than they might have commanded, because they felt they earned enough. Both gave to charitable causes. They also were very secure in their own values, which didn't really include fear of the press. Forever, they will share these distinctions.
Until recently, what separated them was that Woody was the only one who had brought his public image into disrepute. It was due to his bullying others, according to some accounts. If you had the opportunity to see his inflexible but respectful discussions with hippies and Vietnam war protestors, as I did, you might find the argument that he bullied others to be difficult to accept.
What we can all agree is that they were separated by the lack of a defining moment when Jim Tressel revealed himself as very flawed. There was no punch thrown at a taunting player. No headlong dash down the sidelines ripping up yard markers.
Now, those days are gone and Jake's account of events sounds probable to me. We have that incident to look back on, when Tressel revealed that flaw.
Jake;1950942; said:What history will show is Ohio State forfeited all of its wins in 2010. Time won't erase it, and this "side of history" crap you keep peddling is nothing more than "more people will agree with me", as though that proves something.
The fact that you apparently can't tell the difference between what Woody did and what Tressel did is beyond laughable. You have no "point", only emotional appeals.
Woody's gaffe is forgotten by history. No one will ever look at the record of Ohio State football and see anything more than Clemson beat Ohio State in that bowl game. Tressel's will be documented forever. When one sees all of those winning seasons then sees 0-12 it will always point to one explanation, hence his black mark on the University. The two are not remotely the same.
There is more to representing Ohio State as football coach than beating Michigan, at least for some of us. But for many, Tressel will always be a "saint" simply because of that record. That's a "side of history" I'll gladly let go on without me.
Jake;1950949; said:Ripping up a yard marker or throwing a punch is a momentary lapse of reason due to losing one's temper. No doubt Woody woke up the next morning realizing he screwed up and trying to make amends. He never tried to justify such actions.
Consciously choosing to not disclose information one knew had to be disclosed is far different. Every morning from April 2010 Jim Tressel woke up with that information, and each day chose not to disclose it. Had it not been found, there is no evidence to suggest he was ever going to disclose it.
One is a "flaw", the other is something else entirely.
jwinslow;1950954; said:Woody Hayes was paying players and setting up no show jobs. He was banned from the rose bowl, and those violations were much worse than these. The punishment system was simply different back then. If Tressel was caught doing what woody did, gene smith would beg to only be docked twenty scholarships.