Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
BuckeyeMike80;1595083; said:Two, I think the lack of film on the guy made Heacock revert to form, which is, a basic cover-2 defense until he saw what was going on. The problem with that was it left Chimdi on an island that he'd rather forget I'm sure.
NFBuck;1595086; said:Call me a stick in the mud if you must, but the playcalling (on both sides of the ball) yesterday really shook me. Yeah, I know, in the end it worked, but all the positive will that had been built up the previous couple weeks was flushed in my mind when we saw the absolute worst of Tresselball in the 4th quarter. Check my post history, I've been at the forefront standing up for this staff but there's no defending the indefensible. There were about 5-6 of us in the game thread who never lose our cool that came this close to losing it. Big Ten title and Rose Bowl berth on the line and that was the gameplan? Run, run 4 yard pass 5 yards behind the chains? Disheartening to me. I was really hoping going forward that we were seeing the offense and playcalling evolve. Nope.
Sorry, had to vent.
NFBuck;1595086; said:Call me a stick in the mud if you must, but the playcalling (on both sides of the ball) yesterday really shook me. Yeah, I know, in the end it worked, but all the positive will that had been built up the previous couple weeks was flushed in my mind when we saw the absolute worst of Tresselball in the 4th quarter. Check my post history, I've been at the forefront standing up for this staff but there's no defending the indefensible. There were about 5-6 of us in the game thread who never lose our cool that came this close to losing it. Big Ten title and Rose Bowl berth on the line and that was the gameplan? Run, run 4 yard pass 5 yards behind the chains? Disheartening to me. I was really hoping going forward that we were seeing the offense and playcalling evolve. Nope.
Sorry, had to vent.
NFBuck;1595086; said:Call me a stick in the mud if you must, but the playcalling (on both sides of the ball) yesterday really shook me. Yeah, I know, in the end it worked, but all the positive will that had been built up the previous couple weeks was flushed in my mind when we saw the absolute worst of Tresselball in the 4th quarter. Check my post history, I've been at the forefront standing up for this staff but there's no defending the indefensible. There were about 5-6 of us in the game thread who never lose our cool that came this close to losing it. Big Ten title and Rose Bowl berth on the line and that was the gameplan? Run, run 4 yard pass 5 yards behind the chains? Disheartening to me. I was really hoping going forward that we were seeing the offense and playcalling evolve. Nope.
Sorry, had to vent.
Duane is spot on in his analysis. For the above stat lover that saw a different game than I where OSU was 'pounding' for over 200 yards and 4.5 ypc....you take out 4 runs and OSU rushed 47 times for a 2.7 ypc. You take out six plays and OSU rushed 45 times for 2.4 ypc and passed for less than 100 yards and only 6 yards per completion. That is what Duane is talking about
strohs;1595457; said:Well, I for one am not a major college football coach but even I had Iowa figured out by the 2nd series, yet the adjustments were very slow to come...
That comment had me scratching my head as well. It really did. We outclassed and out athleted them all over the field. They had a QB making his first start in an extremely hostile environment with everything on the line. Were they afraid to let him chuck it? Nope. I can't recall off the top of my head, but how many of TPs attempts were past the 1st down marker? I know many of the important ones were 5-6 yards behind. I don't think I've ever been so dumfounded watching a game. I was literally at a loss for words on those last couple drives. Winning cures all, as they say, but that hardly left me with a warm fuzzy. Maybe it's like LJB said and we're kinda numb to that level of success, but man, I felt kind of empty after that. Like I we narrowly escaped a major catastrophe. You're glad you're alive, but you just don't feel like celebrating...billmac91;1595476; said:Anyone else just shake their head when Holly Rowe summarized her half-time interview with Coach T? Essentialy, he said "this game will come down tot he last play". I instantly said "why?". There was no reason not to punish Iowa yesterday. Pryor played IMO, one of the best games of his career, was checking down, and just making overall great decesions. But in the second half, Tressel decided to single-handedly keep Iowa in the game with overly conservative play-calling. It was brutal.....
You can't argue with the results, but damn.....it's football, step on the jugular once in a while.
Unfortunately, I knew the second half would be way too close once I heard the sideline report from Tress that it'd come down to the last play. He just wasn't going to put the game in the offense's hands even though they were executing at an amazingly high level in the passing game.
Indefensible? Certainly not. It's easy to blame the playcalling. That's why neanderthals like Gregg Doyel & Pat Forde do it. When they're agreeing with you, it's time to reassess your position.NFBuck;1595086; said:Call me a stick in the mud if you must, but the playcalling (on both sides of the ball) yesterday really shook me. Yeah, I know, in the end it worked, but all the positive will that had been built up the previous couple weeks was flushed in my mind when we saw the absolute worst of Tresselball in the 4th quarter. Check my post history, I've been at the forefront standing up for this staff but there's no defending the indefensible. There were about 5-6 of us in the game thread who never lose our cool that came this close to losing it. Big Ten title and Rose Bowl berth on the line and that was the gameplan? Run, run 4 yard pass 5 yards behind the chains? Disheartening to me. I was really hoping going forward that we were seeing the offense and playcalling evolve. Nope.
Sorry, had to vent.
Duane is spot on in his analysis. For the above stat lover that saw a different game than I where OSU was 'pounding' for over 200 yards and 4.5 ypc....you take out 4 runs and OSU rushed 47 times for a 2.7 ypc. You take out six plays and OSU rushed 45 times for 2.4 ypc and passed for less than 100 yards and only 6 yards per completion. That is what Duane is talking about
I just want to win games the old-fashioned way, by pounding the living snot out of the opponent for sixty minutes, by running up the score, by going for two in the fourth quarter....
jlb1705;1595499; said:I feel sorry for you if you can't get excited about going to the Rose Bowl.
Indefensible? Certainly not. It's easy to blame the playcalling. That's why neanderthals like Gregg Doyel & Pat Forde do it. When they're agreeing with you, it's time to reassess your position.
Iowa is 6th in FBS in pass efficiency defense. They are 43rd in rushing defense. The Buckeyes were able to run for 100 yards more than Iowa's season average, and damn near had two 100-yd. rushers. Pryor was gimpy and had a cut on his throwing hand. Most of the pass plays that were run that night resulted in scrambles or checkdowns. With all that in mind, what kind of plays should Jim Tressel have been calling, and why would they have been successful?
This isn't one of those "it was right because they won" arguments. The Buckeyes have certainly won in spite of their offense before, but this was not one of those times. Nevermind the fact that Jim Tressel's offensive playcalling didn't give up those 14 Iowa points in the 4th quarter. Jim Tressel's offensive playcalling actually expanded the Buckeyes' lead in the 4th. He called the play that led to Brandon Saine going 49 yards for a TD. How were any of the play calls that Tressel made after that one any worse? Ohio State was abusing the Hawkeyes on the ground. They had the lead and were playing to run out the clock. If Jim Tressel's playcalling were any different, how might this game have ended. Sure, they could've scored again. What if they didn't? What if they didn't score again AND the clock stops a couple extra times? How much time does Iowa have on their final possession when the score is tied? How much more time would've been enough to get Kirk Ferentz to go for the win in regulation when all they needed was a FG? With the Ohio State defense on their heels, another 30-50 seconds for the Hawkeyes could've sent the Buckeyes to Orlando or Tampa in January. How unexciting would that be? Certainly not as exciting as a 5th straight conference championship and a trip to Pasadena.
Merih;1595488; said:That is a ridiculous sentiment quoted...running the ball consistently springs big runs every once in a while. You take out the big runs and you are only looking at half the picture. I know what they are saying...that they want to see 4-6 yards continually. Our backs aren't those types of backs. They take what's given over and over and then pop one every once in a while.