I agree with NorthShore, in that missing days and tardiness are legitimate reasons for any employer to be upset. At the same time, however, I think that their response to your "Meeting with the Bobs" was a pathetic excersize in "forced loyalty".
That's kind of my biggest problem right now... the "forced loyalty" aspect of this. I mean, they've basically said that if we're not signing on for the long-term team, there's the door. Which is fine. I understand where they're coming from on that - they want people who are truly enthusiastic about this place and its future growth. That's their prerogative. Quite honestly, though, I've been hinting to them over the past week or so that this isn't really my five year or longer plan either, and that this isn't my long-term career choice. I'm also not overly enthusiastic about it. In my meeting with the Bobs, I was pretty honest with them, too, and I've gotten a very different reaction - they've been encouraging me to find new, different projects.
So, in Vincent's case, I feel like they're just using the lack of "enthusiasm" as an excuse. I mean - if they want to fire him for tardiness and absenteeism, then they should fire him for that. Fire him for no reason at all - that's fine. Ohio's an employment-at-will state. But pinning the reason on this whole thing with the Bobs - that comes off as totally disingenuous to me. I don't know what their real reasons are. I have some suspicions, but those are largely unimportant. I do know, however, that his work product is fine, and that when he is out, he is missed, and everyone else (especially me) ends up slammed.
Anyway, since there seems to be this odd subterfuge about the real reasons for getting rid of him, I'm going to take it as exactly what they're saying it is, even though I don't believe them. Accordingly, since they've just laid it out there that if we're not signing up for the "team," we're out, I'm very interested to see what comes out of my next, more candid meeting with the Bobs. Really, if that is their real reason for letting Vincent go, then I would feel bad about
not leaving now. Again, it's their prerogative to want only employees who want to spend the rest of their careers here, but if that's what they want, then this simply is not a good fit for me. It's not beneficial to me or to The Firm for me to continue the pretense.