I had no idea that's what you meant. I just pulled the number 310 from my wise ass.Buckeye86 said:I was talking about when he first came to Ohio State and predicted a win. Wise ass. :tongue2:
Upvote
0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I had no idea that's what you meant. I just pulled the number 310 from my wise ass.Buckeye86 said:I was talking about when he first came to Ohio State and predicted a win. Wise ass. :tongue2:
Another very telling quote from mack:By the numbers
320.1: Number of yards, on average, the defense allowed a season ago. Brown said this week that it's the least telling statistic kept on defenses.
Same story with the kickers who look great one day and then not the next. Texas' special teams sound worse with each update."We just need to have more consistent play from each one of them because they all have ability," Brown said. "One will look great one day and come back the next day and drop two balls. We’re looking for consistency at a high level."
"Greg Johnson is kicking off really well with Richmond, so that’s a fight right now. Greg’s punting well. He’s doing much better. We’re excited where Greg is headed, but we still haven’t decided on a field goal kicker."
Shipley has a minor hamstring injury. He should play for game 1. MRI showed the center of the muscle was hurt, which is better than either of the ends.High Lonesome said:do you have a link to the shipley thing? I havent heard that yet....thanks i guess
Zwick is day to day. If not Zwick then Boeckman would start. He's been in the system for three year's now even though he has four years of elegibility left (gray shirt and then redshirt). He should be very capable if Zwick is unable to go. In fact some think that he should start even if Zwick is 100%.hookemhorns2004 said:Shipley has a minor hamstring injury. He should play for game 1. MRI showed the center of the muscle was hurt, which is better than either of the ends.
What's the latest on Zwick's rolled ankel? who would start game 1?
Yes, Babino is badass, and really raising eyebrows.High Lonesome said:No the guy that is going to take his place is an undersized kid named Rashad Babino, He either RS last year or was a rs freshman. Regardless, He is a sam mills type, undersized but just seems to make plays. He always did in highschool and according to all the practice reports I have heard, he is doing the same in Austin.
Note: I am not saying he will be as good as sam mills(see RB vs RT) just saying that is the type of player he is
As a buckeye, would you rahter have Zwick or Boeckman start for game 1?Buckeye86 said:Zwick is day to day. If not Zwick then Boeckman would start. He's been in the system for three year's now even though he has four years of elegibility left (gray shirt and then redshirt). He should be very capable if Zwick is unable to go. In fact some think that he should start even if Zwick is 100%.
Buckeye86 said:I was talking about when he first came to Ohio State and predicted a win. Wise ass. :tongue2:
Haha, ummmmmmmmmmm... that's a good question. I'd probably have to go with Zwick because of the game experience he brings to the table. That's just between Zwick and Boeckman though... when you bring Smith into the picture it gets really confusing. I don't even want to get into that one...hookemhorns2004 said:As a buckeye, would you rahter have Zwick or Boeckman start for game 1?
I agree with that. Your special teams are better than ours at this point. We are toast if we give you guys the field position we were giving Michigan IMO. Thats why we are working on it...but this aspect does worry me.jwinslow said:All I know is that Texas' biggest weakness going into this game was their special teams. Longhorn fans had claimed they were good at punt coverage, yet the punters have been shaky and two different guys have run back punts. The kickoff coverage was obviously already an issue, and I'm not convinced that its going to change enough to stop Ginn/Holmes.
All the talk is about OSU losing their kicker/punter, yet our replacements are on scholarship (and both have been excellent in practice) vs. Texas just signed their first player to kick a ball last year (making him a true frosh if he were to play).
It's blatantly obvious which team values special teams more. If the result of working on it all spring involves shaky punting, shaky kicking, and still having coverage issues... then I see no reason why that isn't still a huge advantage for OSU.
It's called revisionist history . I actually knew he didn't predict a win, I was just too lazy to think of how to explain it exactly so people would know what I was talking about. You obviously knew exactly what I meant and explained it better for me, so thanks. :)MililaniBuckeye said:For the last time, Tressel did not predict a win against Michigan. He said that the fans would be proud of our players on the field in 310 days at Ann Arbor, Michigan...the word "win" or the word "victory" or the word "triumph" was nowhere in that statement.
For the last time?MililaniBuckeye said:For the last time, Tressel did not predict a win against Michigan. He said that the fans would be proud of our players on the field in 310 days at Ann Arbor, Michigan...the word "win" or the word "victory" or the word "triumph" was nowhere in that statement.
Not True. Gerland is the fourth punter Mack has brought in on scholarship and Hunter Lawrence in next years class will be the third kicker. Mack just hasn't been successful recruiting kickers and punters, as walkons have won the jobs since Stockton left.jwinslow said:Texas just signed their first player to kick a ball last year
Sadly, that's how Stoops seemed to view the TX-OU game from when he first came in, although now he probably thinks he owns Dallas, so he doesn't get as fired up about it. I guess winning five in a row will do that for you.Buckeye86 said:On ESPN News Cooper just gave Mack Brown some advice because "we had the same problem at Ohio State against Michigan"... no, YOU had a problem against Michigan you jackass.