Remember this guy? The one who was fawned over after choosing his team over his Rhodes Scholarship candidacy it appeared that an interview would conflict with the game against Harvard? Looks like there might be something else to the story:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/27/s...lar-candidacy.html?_r=2&pagewanted=all?src=tp
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/27/s...lar-candidacy.html?_r=2&pagewanted=all?src=tp
The article also states that Witt has an interest in politics. He's well on his way - he has the alleged sexual assault and public statement half-truths down pat it seems.In early November, according to those with knowledge of the matter, someone told the Rhodes Trust about the sexual assault accusation. The notification was not anonymous; it was not, though, made formally by a Yale official. Rhodes notified Levin, the Yale president, and other university administrators and gave them about a week to decide whether they still wanted to back Witt.
Yet on Nov. 12, The Wall Street Journal quoted Witt saying, ?I just need to make a decision and live with it.? In the same article, Yale?s athletic director, Tom Beckett, described his star quarterback as ?a deep thinker.?
?He likes challenges,? said Beckett, who refused to comment for this article.
?But I?m not sure if this is one that he?s relished.?
Yale had not told Rhodes whether it was re-endorsing Witt when he released a statement through the athletic department the next day.
?I will be playing in the Yale-Harvard game this Saturday,? it said. ?I have withdrawn my application for the Rhodes scholarship.?
The quarterback did not tie the two sentences, but journalists did, reporting that he had given up on the scholarship so that he could play. Neither Witt nor Yale corrected the misimpression.
After the loss to Harvard, when reporters asked whether he was now sorry to have skipped the Rhodes interview, Witt said, ?My decision wasn?t based on winning or losing this game.?
