cincibuck;1644447; said:Maybe Dooley is a good coach and they'll be just fine, but this seems to me to be a rush to judgement. There can't be (m)any college jobs that offer better facilities, a 100K stadium, consistent national leader in attendance, a winning tradition, loyal alums who will travel outside/inside the South.
Seems to me that schools are surprised that certain coaches don't want to move -- Les Myles to Michigan, Bob Stoops to OSU, Mike Riley at the other OSU to USC (!!). And it also seems to me that most ADs get caught without an SOP new hire plan and thus rush to judgement. I'm thinking especially of Michigan, whose AD should have seen the retirement coming. Can one recruiting year be that important? I don't think there are more than a handful of kids in any program that are sold solely on the coach and not the school or the program. some of you who are closer to the recruiting scene -- enlighten me on this.
I have heard the same things Elephant has from people down here (not so much detail on the second part obviously). Not being free to pick your own staff eliminates a school from consideration of any proven, big name coach or for that matter most promising candidates. Most people qualified for a position aren't going to take a job where they feel they are being set up for failure in any profession.
A HC lives and dies by his staff and if he knows going into it he can't control that then most are going to pass and you are going to get a Dooley type hire. No offense to him, he may turn out just fine but as far as why it seems UT "settled" I'd say its 99% due to the staff issue.
Upvote
0