• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

ESPN (A bunch of Death-Spiraling maroons)

WolverineMike;2176561; said:
as long as it goes 100% to cancer research, you can't find any fault in it. Banging on it simply because it's associated with ESPN is obtuse.

Some people wouldn't or don't donate to the V Foundation for the simple fact the Better Business Bureau says it doesn't meet their standards for charities (or "Standards Not Met" designation).

http://www.bbb.org/charity-reviews/national/cancer/v-foundation-for-cancer-research-in-cary-nc-830

Whereas an organization such as the American Cancer Society meets all standards.
 
Upvote 0
Buckeye86;2176606; said:
You are right. Saying something nice about ESPN in a thread dedicated to hating ESPN was perfectly innocent banter and not a troll like attempt to provoke a response.

:lol: He said something nice about a cancer fundraiser. He said it was the one thing they did well.

Let's recap - he says ESPN does one thing well, meaning they are pretty much worthless as an organization, except for this one thing. And the one thing they do well is a fundraiser for cancer.

You guys are bashing him for that. Grow the fuck up.
 
Upvote 0
3074326;2176624; said:
:lol: He said something nice about a cancer fundraiser. He said it was the one thing they did well.

Let's recap - he says ESPN does one thing well, meaning they are pretty much worthless as an organization, except for this one thing. And the one thing they do well is a fundraiser for cancer.

You guys are bashing him for that. Grow the fuck up.

I don't see what you are getting so worked up about. I was agreeing with you.
 
Upvote 0
3074326;2176624; said:
Let's recap - he says ESPN does one thing well, meaning they are pretty much worthless as an organization, except for this one thing.

Damn, you're saying ESPN didn't get this right (a lot better than Erin Andrews, IMO)?

image.jpg
 
Upvote 0
3074326;2176631; said:
So, it's ok for you to troll, and not Mike?

You are the expert on what is trolling and what is not trolling. I leave the interpretation of my intention at your expert discretion.

Having complimented you for being good at something, I assume that you will recant your accusation of my trolling... because saying something positive or complimenting, regardless of context, isn't trolling... based on your previous ruling I assume that's how it works - right?
 
Upvote 0
Buckeye86;2176639; said:
You are the expert on what is trolling and what is not trolling. I leave the interpretation of my intention at your expert discretion.

Having complimented you for being good at something, I assume that you will recant your accusation of my trolling... because saying something positive or complimenting, regardless of context, isn't trolling... based on your previous ruling I assume that's how it works - right?

Great post. I agree.

(I have no idea if my post is sarcasm or not.)
 
Upvote 0
Buckeye86;2176639; said:
You are the expert on what is trolling and what is not trolling. I leave the interpretation of my intention at your expert discretion.

Having complimented you for being good at something, I assume that you will recant your accusation of my trolling... because saying something positive or complimenting, regardless of context, isn't trolling... based on your previous ruling I assume that's how it works - right?

What exactly are you trying to accomplish?
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top