• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Disgraced Former Penn State DC Jerry Sandusky (convicted child molester)

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Sort by date Sort by votes
Jerry Sandusky verdict: Complete breakdown of charges

Former Penn State assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky was found guilty this afternoon of 45 counts of child sexual abuse.

Sandusky faced 52 original counts of abuse, four of which were dismissed during trial. Here's a breakdown of all the charges with verdicts from the jury.

ALLEGED VICTIM 1

Count 1: Involuntary deviate sexual intercourse
Verdict: Guilty.

Count 2: Involuntary deviate sexual intercourse
Verdict: Guilty.

Count 3: Indecent assault
Verdict: Guilty.

Count 4: Unlawful contact with minors
Verdict: Guilty.

Count 5: Corruption of minors
Verdict: Guilty.

Count 6: Endangering welfare of children
Verdict: Guilty.

ALLEGED VICTIM 2

Count 7: Involuntary deviate sexual intercourse
Verdict: Not guilty.

Count 8: Indecent assault
Verdict: Guilty.

Count 9: Unlawful contact with minors
Verdict: Guilty.

Count 10: Corruption of minors
Verdict: Guilty.

Count 11: Endangering welfare of children
Verdict: Guilty.

ALLEGED VICTIM 3

Count 12: Indecent assault
Verdict: Guilty.

Count 13: Unlawful contact with minors
Verdict: Guilty.

Count 14: Corruption of minors
Verdict: Guilty.
Count 15: Endangering welfare of children
Verdict: Guilty.

ALLEGED VICTIM 4

Count 16: Involuntary deviate sexual intercourse
Verdict: Charge was dismissed

Count 17: Involuntary deviate sexual intercourse
Verdict: Guilty.

Count 18: Involuntary deviate sexual intercourse
Verdict: Charge was dismissed

Count 19: Aggravated indecent assault
Verdict: Charge was dismissed

Count 20: Indecent assault
Verdict: Guilty.

Count 21: Unlawful contact with minors
Verdict: Guilty.

Count 22: Corruption of minors
Verdict: Guilty.

Count 23: Endangering welfare of children
Verdict: Guilty.

ALLEGED VICTIM 5

Count 24: Indecent assault
Verdict: Not guilty.

Count 25: Unlawful contact with minors
Verdict: Guilty.

Count 26: Corruption of minors
Verdict: Guilty.

Count 27: Endangering welfare of children
Verdict: Guilty.

ALLEGED VICTIM 6

Count 28: Indecent assault
Verdict: Not guilty.

Count 29: Unlawful contact with minors
Verdict: Guilty.

Count 30: Corruption of minors
Verdict: Guilty.

Count 31: Endangering welfare of children
Verdict: Guilty.

ALLEGED VICTIM 7

Count 32: Criminal attempt to commit indecent assault
Verdict: Guilty.

Count 33: Unlawful contact with minors
Verdict: Charge was dismissed

Count 34: Corruption of minors
Verdict: Guilty.

Count 35: Endangering welfare of children
Verdict: Guilty.

ALLEGED VICTIM 8

Count 36: Involuntary deviate sexual intercourse
Verdict: Guilty.

Count 37: Involuntary deviate sexual intercourse
Verdict: Guilty.

Count 38: Unlawful contact with minors
Verdict: Guilty.

Count 39: Corruption of minors
Verdict: Guilty.

Count 40: Endangering welfare of children
Verdict: Guilty.

ALLEGED VICTIM 9

Count 41: Involuntary deviate sexual intercourse
Verdict: Guilty.

Count 42: Involuntary deviate sexual intercourse
Verdict: Guilty.

Count 43: Indecent assault
Verdict: Guilty.

Count 44: Unlawful contact with minors
Verdict: Guilty.

Count 45: Corruption of minors
Verdict: Guilty.

Count 46: Endangering welfare of children
Verdict: Guilty.

ALLEGED VICTIM 10

Count 47: Involuntary deviate sexual intercourse
Verdict: Guilty.

Count 48: Involuntary deviate sexual intercourse
Verdict: Guilty.

Count 49: Indecent assault
Verdict: Guilty.

Count 50: Unlawful contact with minors
Verdict: Guilty.

Count 51: Corruption of minors
Verdict: Guilty.

Count 52: Endangering welfare of children
Verdict: Guilty.
Click to expand...
 
Upvote 0
jlb1705;2170060; said:
Not me. This scene just makes it more clear that he should have been stopped many years ago.
Click to expand...

Trust me, my hate for that shithole far exceeds everyone here except maybe BN27's. They FINALLY got it right and took people from the OUTSIDE of that sinking ship University to do it. Ped State is going to get theirs now, the Feds, the State of PA and the court of public perception are going to ruin that school for now and forever and it's about fucking time.
 
Upvote 0
Defense Atty Rominger: "Sandusky has been a law-abiding citizen... except for these charges. He respects the process and that's why he was allowed to walk out without handcuffs."

Anderson Cooper: "He was brought out in handcuffs."

Rominger: "Absolutely. [silence]"

Now Toobin is tearing this defense clown apart for asserting they can win an appeal because Sandusky didn't get a continuance. :lol:
 
Upvote 0
jlb1705;2170068; said:
Defense Atty Rominger: "Sandusky has been a law-abiding citizen... except for these charges. He respects the process and that's why he was allowed to walk out without handcuffs."

Anderson Cooper: "He was brought out in handcuffs."

Rominger: "Absolutely. [silence]"

Now Toobin is tearing this defense clown apart for asserting they can win an appeal because Sandusky didn't get a continuance. :lol:
Click to expand...

It is baffling to me that a continuance wasn't granted if it is true that the prosecution dropped 1000s of pages of documents days before trial. At least one continuance is usually the standard.
 
Upvote 0
OH10;2170071; said:
It is baffling to me that a continuance wasn't granted if it is true that the prosecution dropped 1000s of pages of documents days before trial. At least one continuance is usually the standard.
Click to expand...

The expert defense attorney that CNN had on said he's been in that kind of situation himself. His attitude was basically, "tough shit". and that it wouldn't be a winner on appeal. I'm no lawyer myself, just passing along what I saw on TV on this topic.

The same expert said he thought the hearsay testimony of the janitor who is no longer competent to testify is more of a possibility for a successful appeal. That would only concern a handful of the charges though.
 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top