Birm has went as far to state that Wilson AND Keeley would be Buckeyes without NIL. That stings even moreKurelic said that Wilson but for the money, loved the Buckeyes, and probably would have picked the Bucks.
Money talks
Upvote
0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Birm has went as far to state that Wilson AND Keeley would be Buckeyes without NIL. That stings even moreKurelic said that Wilson but for the money, loved the Buckeyes, and probably would have picked the Bucks.
Money talks
Birm has went as far to state that Wilson AND Keeley would be Buckeyes without NIL. That stings even more

But it's OK "we don't want to play that game"... even though the top schools are doing it and there's nothing illegal about it.That is the difference between a natty and a set of steak knives.
Obviously he was wrong and miscalculated that one.Birm has went as far to state that Wilson AND Keeley would be Buckeyes without NIL. That stings even more
That is the difference between a natty and a set of steak knives.
Texas A+M has an NFL payroll and finished with a losing record, while Michigan and TCU are in the playoffs with players that no one wanted to buy.But it's OK "we don't want to play that game"... even though the top schools are doing it and there's nothing illegal about it.
That program is led by someone named Jimbo. Anyone doubt someone like Saban would organize a pay for play more effectively?Texas A+M has an NFL payroll and finished with a losing record, while Michigan and TCU are in the playoffs with players that no one wanted to buy.
There's a right way and a wrong to conduct business, and throwing money at people is almost always the wrong way.
There's a right way and a wrong to conduct business, and throwing money at people is almost always the wrong way.
Coaches have to have a handle on everything..I think coaches need to be aware that the year players become draft eligible you may need to have tremendous two way communication. You might assume third year players should be locked in to culture etc. You need to be ready for those guys to have a different motivation and be listening to outside voices than the voices inside the program.
We were counting heavily on JSN we needed Fleming to bust out or prepare a freshman to be ready.Pantoni's role is going to have to expand in this new environment imo. That role is going to need a staff because you are going to have to know the market for possible acquisition and defections. You'll need some sort of "net talent level" metric and doing all that is well beyond the capacity of one guy watching endless hours of film.
Related to that-one thing I could see happening almost instantly is a big shake up in the recruiting rankings world as we've known it up to this point. Landing a top 5 class is almost a dead metric for success already. Why over pay for all that new HS talent when you can fill so many gaps with transfers? Then, how do you start measuring the real "value" of a transfer? He isn't that 3 star from HS anymore. He's turned into something else now. How they start to put the value on these guys will be interesting to see. It might be an opportunity for a PFF type organization to muscle in on the current HS recruiting ranking business.
Counter point: doing business the Michigan and TCU way is not a sustainable model for CFB either. There is a difference between getting to the playoffs and winning the playoffs.Texas A+M has an NFL payroll and finished with a losing record, while Michigan and TCU are in the playoffs with players that no one wanted to buy.
There's a right way and a wrong to conduct business, and throwing money at people is almost always the wrong way.