Coronavirus (COVID-19) is too exciting for adults to discuss (CLOSED)

[ORD_Buckeye]

Interesting developments in Wisconsin in the 7-10 day window after the state's supreme court struck down the stay at home order.

 

[heisman]

Interesting developments in Wisconsin in the 7-10 day window after the state's supreme court struck down the stay at home order.

More testing apparently.

https://wtmj.com/news/coronavirus/2...consin-after-largest-testing-day-of-pandemic/

 

[Jake]

 

[ORD_Buckeye]

More testing apparently.

https://wtmj.com/news/coronavirus/2...consin-after-largest-testing-day-of-pandemic/

Looks like a little of both. More tests, but the percent of positive tests spiked back up too.

 

[heisman]

Looks like a little of both. More tests, but the percent of positive tests spiked back up too.

It will be interesting to see how it progresses. The cheeseheads definitely came out swinging the second the order was removed.

 

[sparcboxbuck]

Looks like a little of both. More tests, but the percent of positive tests spiked back up too.

Kinda difficult to tell if it’s statistically or even a meaningful difference without a secondary y-axis.

 

[sparcboxbuck]

Alas! I must love my country and it's people too much because I've taken a side that actually want's all Americans to live! I'm stupid like that. So go ahead and call me names. It won't hurt my feelings.

So, in other words... shut down everything controllable that can lead to someone pushing daisies?


There are a lot of people who would fail as risk managers among this board.

 

[lvbuckeye]

You are in the Matrix, dude! And you can't escape!

I ate the red pill a long time ago, my friend.

 

[jwinslow]

Is it consistent now? Not interested in consistency, interested in efficacy.

The people are much more interested in the former. Your plan would lose their respect too, as will all plans.

 

[heisman]

The people are much more interested in the former. Your plan would lose their respect too, as will all plans.

A plan that would reduce deaths by 95%, wouldn’t be respected? I beg to differ.

 

[OSU_Buckguy]

I ate the red pill a long time ago, my friend.

There's no such thing as a vaccine for a fucking virus.

 

[Jagdaddy]

When did flatten the curve become fear for your life?

When every single thing became political, which coincides with online "discussion" and "debate" being a thing.

You misspelled "corporations."

No he didn't. Corporations are people too, ya know.

 

[jwinslow]

A plan that would reduce deaths by 95%, wouldn’t be respected? I beg to differ.

This plan has reduced a lot of deaths. I haven't seen that be persuasive whatsoever to the doubters.

You said the inconsistency is where they lost people. I say that's going to always happen, and people will always resist soon after being asked to do something against their wishes.

 

[chillinvillian]

I was on board with flatten the curve. They lost me when they decided to take the constitution and wipe their asses with it.

 

[heisman]

This plan has reduced a lot of deaths. I haven't seen that be persuasive whatsoever to the doubters.

You said the inconsistency is where they lost people. I say that's going to always happen, and people will always resist soon after being asked to do something against their wishes.

No, when they changed the entire narrative is when they lost everyone equipped with rational thought. The Rowdy Roddy Piper school of politics, “Just when they think they know the answers, I change the questions!” Classic Piper!! Worked great in the WWF, so might as well give it a shot in politics!