If it goes more than 2-3 weeks (lockdowns) I don't see how we can avoid this basic conflict.
I think it's important to remember that "flattening the curve" doesn't mean they are saving anyone in the older age group. It means they are trying to delay the inevitable just long enough not to swamp the medical system and kill a bunch of people currently sick from something else.
Three groups here really; 1) the financially at risk, 2) the potentially at risk if health care system is swamped and 3) the at risk group from CVID-19
#3 is in trouble no matter what.
#2 is a complete unknown as to extent/duration etc
#1 is the group being consciously harmed
Seems to me like they are working the problem backwards. Logic tells me to save #1, take chances with #2 and say goodbye to #3.
So, here's where it all gets sticky...
Its really #2 plus #3 that's the problem - because #2 and #3 are the same thing.
Even if you're over 80, you're more likely to die from pneumonia in that age group (I don't have a citation here, but we can call that 30% or so)
If you have no pre-existing condition, the fatality rate is less than 1% -- as much as we keep talking about old people, its not really what's going on, the older you are the more likely you are to have co-morbidity.
AGE
DEATH RATE
all cases
80+ years old
14.8%
70-79 years old
8.0%
60-69 years old
3.6%
50-59 years old
1.3%
40-49 years old
0.4%
30-39 years old
0.2%
20-29 years old
0.2%
10-19 years old
0.2%
0-9 years old
no fatalities
PRE-EXISTING CONDITION
DEATH RATE
confirmed cases
DEATH RATE
all cases
Cardiovascular disease
13.2%
10.5%
Diabetes
9.2%
7.3%
Chronic respiratory disease
8.0%
6.3%
Hypertension
8.4%
6.0%
Cancer
7.6%
5.6%
no pre-existing conditions
0.9%
Upvote
0