• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Columbus Blue Jackets (Official Thread)

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Sort by date Sort by votes
NUTS4theBUCKS28;1609009; said:
actually no and there really is a penalty called checking from behind just so you know. and dont tell me i dont know hockey because i play hockey so why dont you just stfu. i am all for physical hockey.
Click to expand...

Pft... BO knows hockey


bo.jpg
 
Upvote 0
Bucky Katt;1609008; said:
Official Rules - Rule 44: Checking from Behind - NHL.com - Rules
Click to expand...

NUTS4theBUCKS28;1609009; said:
actually no and there really is a penalty called checking from behind just so you know. and dont tell me i dont know hockey because i play hockey so why dont you just stfu. i am all for physical hockey.
Click to expand...

No shit sherlock, but it's NEVER called in the NHL. The guy has to be boarded or an obvious cross check has to occur.

Oh and you play hockey? Well la-de-freakin-da. I guess we should all bow down to your superior knowledge ( :lol: ) because you "play" hockey. :lol:

Shut up and go bandwagon on the Bengals more loser.

Buckeyeskickbuttocks;1609010; said:
If by "no touch icing" you mean plowing the opposing goalie with a face full of snow, then count me in. :biggrin:
Click to expand...

:slappy: if Nash does it, no penalty as there shouldn't be.

IF Tomas HOlmstrom does it, he'll get a lifetime ban :biggrin:
 
Upvote 0
Buckeyeskickbuttocks;1609020; said:
Seriously, don't instigate. You've established your hockey credentials, the rules have been posted for all to see.... take your internet win and move on. No sense in calling BMike out.
Click to expand...

Fuck the instigator penalty.

Improper use of the word instigate in a hockey thread by BKB - half the distance to the goal - automatic first down.

Look, everyone! It's Mike's favorite person!
 
Upvote 0
BuckeyeMike80;1609019; said:
No [censored] sherlock, but it's NEVER called in the NHL. The guy has to be boarded or an obvious cross check has to occur.

Oh and you play hockey? Well la-de-freakin-da. I guess we should all bow down to your superior knowledge ( :lol: ) because you "play" hockey. :lol:

Shut up and go bandwagon on the Bengals more loser.



:slappy: if Nash does it, no penalty as there shouldn't be.

IF Tomas HOlmstrom does it, he'll get a lifetime ban :biggrin:
Click to expand...

wtf is your problem, im not saying i have "superior knowledge", douche, but i am just saying that the call needs to be made more often to protect the players. the bengals remark you made was just not called for. i would really like to know why you think i am a bandwagon fan, seriously. douchebag
 
Upvote 0
Bucky Katt;1609024; said:
Fuck the instigator penalty.

Improper use of the word instigate in a hockey thread by BKB - half the distance to the goal - automatic first down.

Look, everyone! It's Mike's favorite person!
Click to expand...

The best part is his hockey cred made me forget temporarily to turn the channel so I wouldn't see the Evil Elf's interview with Rimer :smash:

Damn I wish the Wings stream was working tonight :evil:
 
Upvote 0
Buckeyeskickbuttocks;1609027; said:
You too, Mike. No sense in having a pissing match over this.

Bucky, I'm throwing the red flag... calling time out.. whatever it takes to get that one reviewed. No way SEC officials let that bullshit stand.
Click to expand...

Shit. We got an SEC crew tonight? Fuck.....

JXC;1609028; said:
I love when fans of the same team get in fights with each other. :shake:
Click to expand...

:lol:
 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top