Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
maximumblitz;2332657; said:Its tragic that more tOSU players did not get drafted. I feel for those left behind. However, it is good to see Hankins go before Gholston.
But moving on to crass statistical analysis, Wiscy and Michigan State were hit harder than tOSU, losing some of their run game, but tOSU was hit harder than tSUN, most notably of course, on the d-line.
tOSU: lost 3 (2 DT, 4 DE, 7 OT)
tSUN: lost 2 (5 WR, 6 DT)
mstat: lost 3 (2 RB, 4 DE, 4 TE)
Wiscy: lost 3 (1 C., 2 RB, 5 OT)
FCollinsBuckeye;2332667; said:How does this affect the College Football Playoff(TM)?
buckeyesin07;2155460; said:Don't kid yourself. The Big Ten most certainly wanted on-campus semifinal games. Problem is, they didn't have the votes. Delany's smart enough to realize he'd be fighting a losing battle if he insisted on on-campus semifinal games.
The College Football Playoff selection committee is beginning to take shape.
According to a report from the Sporting News, the committee will include current athletic directors, former coaches and players and possibly former media members. While the total number of members isn't know, it's reported that one athletic director from each of the five power conferences -- ACC, Big Ten, Big 12, Pac-12 and SEC -- will be represented.
As for conflicts of interest, if an athletic director's school is being considered for the playoff, that athletic director will leave the room while the other members vote on that team.
It is not known how often the committee will meet or how often the committee will release a poll of the top teams in the country.
In May, Bill Hancock, the executive director of the College Football Playoff, said "athletic directors are eligible now, but that could change." Apparently, it did not.
The first year of the College Football Playoff will be the 2014 season.
Cities that definitely will bid for the Jan. 11, 2016, game: Glendale, Ariz.; Jacksonville, Fla.; New Orleans; San Antonio; and Tampa.
Cities that will bid for the Jan. 9, 2017, game: Arlington; Jacksonville; Miami; New Orleans; San Antonio; and Tampa.
Houston, Nashville, Tenn., San Francisco, San Diego and Washington, D.C., are other cities that have shown interest in pursuing future College Football Playoff championship games.
New York Yankees officials have said they were interested in Yankee Stadium hosting a championship game, but the stadium does not met the minimum seating requirement.
Cities that definitely will bid for the Jan. 11, 2016, game: Glendale, Ariz.; Jacksonville, Fla.; New Orleans; San Antonio; and Tampa.
Cities that will bid for the Jan. 9, 2017, game: Arlington; Jacksonville; Miami; New Orleans; San Antonio; and Tampa. Quote:
Houston, Nashville, Tenn., San Francisco, San Diego and Washington, D.C., are other cities that have shown interest in pursuing future College Football Playoff championship games.
New York Yankees officials have said they were interested in Yankee Stadium hosting a championship game, but the stadium does not met the minimum seating requirement.
cincibuck;2357680; said:Will someone please get a hold of Chicago? This is just a sell out of Midwest football.