Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The talking heads are the same folks who wanted Baylor and TCU in 2014. They also ignore that Okie got in without a CCG victory. Actually the purpose of the talking heads is to create an audience and the best way to do that is have an on air food fight. Statistics and reason are not necessary. Conflicting arguments and personalities are.After watching the talking heads this morning, the biggest controversy right now seems to be Ohio State with a possibility to make it in over a (theoretically) Big Ten champ PSU. That PSU has the head-to-head and also a championship. I understand that argument but I also rival it with saying, look at the resumes and look at the W-L totals.
That said, for the Buckeyes best interest let's hope Wisconsin wins the Big Ten over PSU (should OSU not get into the B1G title game).
After watching the talking heads this morning, the biggest controversy right now seems to be Ohio State with a possibility to make it in over a (theoretically) Big Ten champ PSU. That PSU has the head-to-head and also a championship. I understand that argument but I also rival it with saying, look at the resumes and look at the W-L totals.
That said, for the Buckeyes best interest let's hope Wisconsin wins the Big Ten over PSU (should OSU not get into the B1G title game).
I think the B1G's best-case scenario is Wisconsin beating the piss out of PSU and vaulting them into the top 4, which would mean OSU is a lock.
fifyOhio States case for inclusion cannot be questioned.
Not at all. You're speaking in poll mentality. They cleaned the slate and looked at the records. They did it the right way. Buckeyes played 4 ranked teams going 3-1, no one else has, so the get 2. Then they looked at Clemson and ttun, both are 3-0 agains ranked teams with a loss to an untanked team. They then probably used the eye test and see Clemson could have lost a few more and gave ttun the nod. The Louisville is only 1-2 against ranked teams and only 2 wins against teams with a winning record and put them 5th. That's my problem. I would have put them after Washington and Wisconsin and probably before penn state. The only thing Louisville has shown is they can run up the score on aweful teams. Everyone in the top 20 but Clemson has shown that. Louisville has just run up the score more often because they have played so much more garbage. They play in a conference with 2 good teams and on the other division literally played the two worst teams then scheduled a mediocre OOC.TTUN LOST and they dropped exactly ZERO spots. There's no excuse for that as they should've seen some sort of drop.
Imagine this:
OSU and PSU both win out, with PSU getting the extra win for the B1G championship.
Final Rankings: 1.Bama 2.OSU 3.Clemson 4.PSU
PSU beats Bama, OSU beats Clemson.
All B1G NC game. OSU takes revenge in a blowout victory where PSU never sees a penalty flag thrown against their team and OSU gets everything called on them so no reffing to blame.
One can wish.
No. Imagine this:
OSU and PSU both win out, PSU wins the B1G outright and has the head to head W over Ohio State.
Final Rankings: 1. Bama 2. Ohio State 3. Clemson 4. Washington
The committee doesn't even take Penn State.
That's my wish, even if the priapism kills me.
You're funny with that last commment. Buckeyes would be 4-1 against ranked teams and 3-1 against top 10. Cards may end up 0-1 against ranked teams after the noles lose to a soon to be unranked gators.No one is going to pick an 11 - 1 ACC team over an 11 - 1 Ohio State unless the Cards manage to blow out Houston and Kentucky by 30 - 40 points each while the Bucks struggle to win their final two.
Yes, but...You're funny with that last commment. Buckeyes would be 4-1 against ranked teams and 3-1 against top 10. Cards may end up 0-1 against ranked teams after the noles lose to a soon to be unranked gators.