How it all went wrong in Cleveland
The house of cards that was the Cleveland Indians tumbled atop Acta yesterday when he was fired because of "results" -- to be specific, that epic 5-28 stretch during the second half. What was more stunning than the collapse was that the Indians had played winning baseball until then through 99 games -- 50-49. Truth be told, Cleveland found its level. It has the talent of a 90-plus loss team.
The Indians lost nearly all the bets they placed on supplementing what little talent they did have on hand. Derek Lowe was cut. Grady Sizemore and Travis Hafner couldn't stay on the field. Casey Kotchman couldn't hit. And the biggest bust of all was the colossal mistake of Ubaldo Jimenez. The Indians raided their prospect cupboard midway through last season to get Jimenez from Colorado. When the Rockies did cartwheels about shedding a 27-year-old starter under a fair contract, it should have set off alarms in Cleveland.
Jimenez is a mirage built off a 14-start window to open the 2010 season, in which he went 13-1 and enjoyed fantastic run support and a .245 batting average on balls in play. When the Indians traded for him last year, however, he was 12-16 with a 4.40 ERA in his previous 40 starts. Forty starts! That sample -- bigger and more recent -- should have meant more than the 14-start rainbow of good luck in 2010.
The Indians thought they could "fix" his awful mechanics. Here is how it has worked out in 43 starts with Cleveland: he's actually worse -- 13-21 with a 5.43 ERA. Over his past 79 starts Jimenez is 25-37 with a 4.91 ERA, devolving into Chris Volstad or Luke Hochevar or whatever starter you want to pick who somehow keeps getting the baseball despite lousy results.
Read more:
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/20...land-indians-yankees/index.html#ixzz27sCbMnlG