• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Cleveland Browns (Finally drafting Buckeyes)

C'mon... we all know by now they just get Kiper's espn subscription and draft 'BPA' (unless it's a Buckeye).

Perhaps worse at times.. PFF.

Go down the list of our 2016 picks. All the top of PFF's rankings for that round at their respective positions.

Which blows my mind because for as much "traditional" scouting they do while watching film to compile their grades, they still ranked Corey Coleman and Ogbah as the highest at the positions.

Their grading model is their God and not to be questioned. Either that or they discount drop rates, alignment, opponent grade, coverage, etc etc so heavily that it's almost not factored at all.

With how rushed this office is feeling, I hope and pray we don't have a 2016 draft repeat.
 
Upvote 0
I'm hopping for over. They need to give this group at least 3 years regardless of results. If it isn't working by then move the team to Knoxville and become Steelers fans.

1. Alignment
2. ?
3. Super Bowl!!!


giphy.gif
 
Upvote 0
Data, data, data everywhere...



I'd say it still falls on the analyst / programmer ...
ML is extremely powerful, if you can efficiently find the tells.
The stuff going on in Football, whether it's espin' rankings or browns' idiocy, is low grade shit though.
Kind of shocking when you consider the money involved.

Depodesta is probably 20 years behind the curve. In CompSci that may as well be 1000 years.

If Haslam is too stupid to hire competent front office the traditional CEO way, how would he ever make a good hire in Machine Learning?
The kind of person that gains his trust is far more likely to be a conman or hasbeen than somebody that knows what they're doing.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
Depodesta is probably 20 years behind the curve. In CompSci that may as well be 1000 years.

Is there a reason you're saying this? I'm not saying your not right, I just was wondering what the background is here.

(And if you say, "I walked by his office and he was playing solitaire on windows 3.1 - I will accept that)
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top