Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Ah yes, tanking for and drafting a QB high. A strategy that’s clearly worked well for the Browns over the years.MAYBE this was a semi tanking strategy to cut off a couple wins.. increase the draft position.. to pick a better QB
The problem isn’t that they traded him. The problem is they didn’t bother to try to maximize the return.
Or, hear me out, you don't fucking sell.I'm selling a car, it no longer fits my long term plans and I need to invest the capital elsewhere in the near future.
I believe the car is worth $125
- I'm offered $80. I say no.
- I'm offered $100.
Those are my only two offers I recieve.
I take the top offer.
That's what the Browns took, the $100. That is the most a buyer was willing to play. Ergo, the Browns maximized their possible return as sellers. If there was a better offer, it would have been accepted.
In the Browns defense, the No Trade Clause handcuffed them. However, they did agree to that as part of the record-breaking contract they signed Myles to at the time, so odds are they limited their trade return haul by their own agreement.I'm selling a car, it no longer fits my long term plans and I need to invest the capital elsewhere in the near future.
I believe the car is worth $125
- I'm offered $80. I say no.
- I'm offered $100.
Those are my only two offers I recieve.
I take the top offer.
That's what the Browns took, the $100. That is the most a buyer was willing to play. Ergo, the Browns maximized their possible return as sellers. If there was a better offer, it would have been accepted.
Talking heads are saying, in essence, Browns got "2 1sts, 2 2nds and a 3rd" for MilesRaiders got 2 firsts for Maxx Crosby