Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I thought Peppers did well at the introductory conference. I have a glimmer of hope. I kind of like all three of the guys they picked in round 1. They impressed me.
I didn't expect to, but there it is.
Liked the Kizer pick too.
I understand the skepticism from all the other fans in this thread...but honestly, I think the Browns had an incredible draft. Were there stupid picks? Sure. But overall, I think the Browns had one of the best drafts, if not the best. Pair that with Hue Jackson (and I maintain that the Bengals are idiotic for not promoting him and firing Lewis)...I think he made all the right moves overall.
Take this with an ocean-sized grain of salt since I'm a Cincy fan, but I'm beyond envious of your draft. At least you waited until Round 6 to draft your woman beater. Cincy traded back for basically nothing to get ours in the 2nd.
I think if they would have taken Hooker at 12, it would have been an "A" draft.I understand the skepticism from all the other fans in this thread...but honestly, I think the Browns had an incredible draft. Were there stupid picks? Sure. But overall, I think the Browns had one of the best drafts, if not the best. Pair that with Hue Jackson (and I maintain that the Bengals are idiotic for not promoting him and firing Lewis)...I think he made all the right moves overall.
Take this with an ocean-sized grain of salt since I'm a Cincy fan, but I'm beyond envious of your draft. At least you waited until Round 6 to draft your woman beater. Cincy traded back for basically nothing to get ours in the 2nd.
I guess technically the browns signed a buckeye
I was thinking about Peppers from the perspective of an offensive coordinator in the NFL.I think if they would have taken Hooker at 12, it would have been an "A" draft.
I've never been one of those "the clowns should load up on Buckeyes" people. In fact, when everybody was clamoring for them to sign Troy Smith years ago, I argued that it wasn't a great idea because he simply wasn't an NFL QB. However, they seem to actively AVOID Buckeyes even when they are the best alternative, and to pass over one, who I think is gonna be a beast in the NFL, for the most overhyped scUMmer possibly of all-time was just idiotic.
Maybe GerbiLLL blossoms in Gregg Williams' defense, and if he does, I'll take my crow, but I watched enough of him in college to develop an informed opinion that he was not a good draft pick.
Like I said yesterday, good teams have star players. For years, the clowns seem happy trading down and passing on potential stars to pick a bunch of "guys." And the results have shown it's a flawed strategy.
So here's another kick to the dick for you guys:Comprehensive dispatch from the Browns war room by Mike Silver:
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap30...show-inside-look-at-how-browns-draft-unfolded
After the Kansas City Chiefs traded up to 10th and selected Mahomes, the quarterback who Jackson felt had the biggest upside, that left Watson as the highest-ranked QB on Cleveland's board. Watson, in Jackson's eyes, was the passer best suited to play right away, but he was not the man he hoped the Browns would select with the 12th pick. Instead, he was looking to provide Williams with another potential star: Ohio State safety Malik Hooker. "To me, he has a chance to be another Ed Reed," Jackson would tell me later. "When I coached in Baltimore, I saw firsthand what kind of impact a great safety can have."
The role that Peppers will fill, SS, nickel/ big nickel &return man... those spots can be found with great value and effectiveness in the mid rounds.
In today's NFL if you want to show 8 man fronts pre-snap or create one post snap, you NEED a pro-bowl center field player. The guy that will make QB's pay for testing his range. It's that simple.
You need that position every bit as much as you need having great corner play.
Yes, Malik's angles and tackling leave something to be desired. However the range he provides you might be well worth the risk. I fear we've passed on that player.
Also, allow me to say this. While I hate scUM, I think Peppers under Williams and with a decent pass rush may turn out to be alright. His man coverage needs some improvement but I think he has the ability to be better than TJ Ward was. That's really the benchmark I'm going to hold him to and for the most part it will be the position he plays.
Not easy for me to say that, but the kid is physically gifted. Now putting the together the stuff that goes between the ears is a different story.
TJ Ward is probably the best comparison I've seen, for both the good and the bad.
"Physically gifted" is the constant position each side uses when arguing for or against. In the first round of the draft, teams should be matching and selecting "physically gifted" and "excels at position of need". These teams love the promise of potential, regardless of how far off the player actually is.
Peppers isn't the enforcer that TJ was, but again, he'll be asked to play a similar role.
By physically gifted, I mean for a safety/nickel spot. He has above average burst and top end with good lateral movement. So I don't think man coverage will be as bad for him as it was for TJ in the early going.
That said, TJ is the standard I will still hold him to. So I very much expect a pro-bowl berth as a defender NOT a special teams player first and foremost.