Yes. I appreciate that he runs a (supposedly) clean program. But, when push comes to shove, with the brand we have as a university, we should expect more. We should be an Elite 8 team every 4 years. We have the resources, brand name, and urban market to do so.
This is where the criticism usually jumps the shark.
Not
can do better, or that they should strive for better. It's offered up as something that should be expected at a university that just doesn't care about basketball. The athletic department might, but the fans do not. There's not an established tradition of excellence. They're kinda good occasionally, and with the right coach, they can be dangerous.
There are 6 blue bloods: UK, UNC, UCLA, Duke, Kansas and Indiana.
One of those hasn't been to the elite 8 in 18 years.
OSU has fulfilled the alleged expectation twice in their history, 1939-50, and 1960-71. They didn't do it under O'Brien. They didn't even really do it under thad, as there was a 5 year gap between the two and then it fell off a cliff after the 3rd appearance.
This mostly comes down to Michigan is doing something that OSU fans want.
The two schools are tied for 6th with the most elite eight appearances. But Michigan has plenty of valleys too, 14 years, 8 years, 12 years, 9 years without elite 8 appearances. They had no business getting in this year, but the criteria is laughable and now they'll probably talent their way into an elite 8, and his success (check's notes, barely breaking .500 on the year) will be thrown in Chris' face.