• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Charlie Weis (ex-Kansas HC, ex-Fla OC, Notre Dame legend, UnDecided Schematic Advantage)

LightningRod;875773; said:
None of the coaches you mentioned were crowned football geniuses before they coached their first games at their respective universities, and neither coach was making multi-millions of dollars a year by year two for achieving what is basically squat.
that still doesn't make Weis a bad coach
 
Upvote 0
LightningRod;875776; said:
That doesn't make him a good coach either. before anybody starts comparing Weis to Woody, JoePa, and Bobby Bowden, let's see if Weis can lead a team to some accomplishment other than winning the Commander in Chief Trophy.
You are right about the comparison 100%
Turning that team around even the little bit he has is an accomplishment and no one can do that except a coach.
The biggest thing a coach can do is get his players to believe in him and Weis has done that.
 
Upvote 0
Best Buckeye;875775; said:
that still doesn't make Weis a bad coach
Well, it sure doesn't make him a friggiin' "genius" either!
It seems he can recruit well. As non-Domer fans we reserve the right to see them actually win some games against the big boys before we let anyone get away with the "genius" talk and the "he won 3 super bowls" talk. Until then, they will be called out on it, and Charlie can keep cussing out the refs.
 
Upvote 0
NightmaresDad;875779; said:
Well, it sure doesn't make him a friggiin' "genius" either!
It seems he can recruit well. As non-Domer fans we reserve the right to see them actually win some games against the big boys before we let anyone get away with the "genius" talk and the "he won 3 super bowls" talk. Until then, they will be called out on it, and Charlie can keep cussing out the refs.
Who said he is a frigging genius?? certainly not me :tongue2:
 
Upvote 0
LightningRod;875783; said:
ND had two BCS games gift wrapped for them. Sorry but I don't see the turn-around to which you are referring, and I certainly cannot see any possible way Weis is mentioned in the same breath with Woody, JoePa, And Bobby Bowden.
what was ND 's record before he got there and what has it been since he got there.
Me either
 
Upvote 0
NOTREDAMECHIEF;875763; said:
I am certainly not comparing Charlie to these guys but not all of the great coach's got off to a fantastic start there first 2 years.


Woody Hayes 10-6-2
Joe Paterno 13-7-1
Bobby Bowden 15-8

Charlie 19-6

First, it's "coaches" (plural form of "coach"), not "coach's" (possessive form of "coach")...not to mention "there" should be "their".

Second, you are indeed "comparing" them when you directly compare records of coaches during the same portion of their careers.

Third, Hayes, Paterno, and Bowden were relatively young coaches coming into big-name schools either from smaller programs with little experience (Hayes had only two years at Miami, Oh; Bowden only four at Samford, Al) or no experience at all (Paterno). Weis came in from a 3-time Super Bowl champion team (albeit he was an offensive coordinator there and not a head coach) and had been a coach at the pro level for 14 years.

Fourth, look at the second years of all four coaches. Hayes was 6-3, with the three losses coming by scores of 21-14, 8-0, and 21-14 (Ohio State also pounded Michigan 27-7 that year). Paterno was 8-2-1, with losses by scores of 23-22 and 17-15, with a 17-17 tie with Fla St in the Gator Bowl. Bowden went 10-2-1 with losses by scores of 23-17 and 41-16 (and won the Tangerine Bowl huge, 40-17). Conversely, while Weis did go 10-3, all three of his losses were total destructions: 47-21, 44-24, and 41-14. Weis has also lost both bowl games.

Probably not a smart comparison on your part...
 
Upvote 0
LightningRod;875776; said:
That doesn't make him a good coach either. before anybody starts comparing Weis to Woody, JoePa, and Bobby Bowden, let's see if Weis can lead a team to some accomplishment other than winning the Commander in Chief Trophy.

Another subjrect but after looking at OSU's schedule this year you would be wise to stop the Commander in Chief comments....
 
Upvote 0
MililaniBuckeye;875789; said:
First, it's "coaches" (plural form of "coach&quot:wink:, not "coach's" (possessive form of "coach&quot:wink:...not to mention "there" should be "their".

Second, you are indeed "comparing" them when you directly compare records of coaches during the same portion of their careers.

Third, Hayes, Paterno, and Bowden were relatively young coaches coming into big-name schools either from smaller programs with little experience (Hayes had only two years at Miami, Oh; Bowden only four at Samford, Al) or no experience at all (Paterno). Weis came in from a 3-time Super Bowl champion team (albeit he was an offensive coordinator there and not a head coach) and had been a coach at the pro level for 14 years.

Fourth, look at the second years of all four coaches. Hayes was 6-3, with the three losses coming by scores of 21-14, 8-0, and 21-14 (Ohio State also pounded Michigan 27-7 that year). Paterno was 8-2-1, with losses by scores of 23-22 and 17-15, with a 17-17 tie with Fla St in the Gator Bowl. Bowden went 10-2-1 with losses by scores of 23-17 and 41-16 (and won the Tangerine Bowl huge, 40-17). Conversely, while Weis did go 10-3, all three of his losses were total destructions: 47-21, 44-24, and 41-14. Weis has also lost both bowl games.

Probably not a smart comparison on your part...

Spin it however you want.... my point was made....
 
Upvote 0
NOTREDAMECHIEF;875796; said:
Another subjrect but after looking at OSU's schedule this year you would be wise to stop the Commander in Chief comments....

I would bet that Youngstown State would beat Army and would give Navy and Air Force all they could handle...
 
Upvote 0
Best Buckeye;875788; said:
what was ND 's record before he got there and what has it been since he got there.
Me either
Davie - 1997-2001 - W-35 L-25, Bowl Game Wins - 0, Percentage 0.583

Willingham 2002-2004 W-21 L-16, Bowl Game Wins - 0, Percentage 0.568

Weis 2005-2006 W-19 L-6, Bowl Game Wins - 0, Percentage 0.760

He has at least turned around the Win-Loss numbers during the regular season.

What he has not done is win big games against USC or in Bowl Games. I figure they might get of the Bowl Game snide if they are willing to accept a lower bowl bid - somewhere with Blue Turf perhaps?

(Oh yes, the Buckeyes and 'SC - Winning Percentages of 0.880 and 0.885, both with only 3 losses over that period. The 0.880 percentage is a record shared by the Buckeyes, Texas Christian, and the 'Eers. The 0.885 only equaled by Texas in that 2-year span.)
 
Upvote 0
MililaniBuckeye;875789; said:
Probably not a smart comparison on your part...

You forget that Charlie Weis coaches at Notre Dame. Losing to USC one of those times counts as a win, and losing Bowl games is OK, because Weis has already won Super Bowls. He also recruited a quarterback who pretty much just needs to step out onto the field so he can receive his Heisman. Also, the military academies are much better football teams that we give them credit for.

I think that Weis's success in college football might be so great, that he's going to make it to the College Football Hall of Fame, the Pro Football Hall of Fame, the Hockey Hall of Fame, the Baseball Hall of Fame, the Rugweaver's Hall of Fame, the annual Star Trek Convention, and to Time's Man of the Forever.
 
Upvote 0
Zurp;875804; said:
I think that Weis's success in college football might be so great, that he's going to make it to the College Football Hall of Fame, the Pro Football Hall of Fame, the Hockey Hall of Fame, the Baseball Hall of Fame, the Rugweaver's Hall of Fame, the annual Star Trek Convention, and to Time's Man of the Forever.

I think he'll get turned down for the NutriSystem Hall of Fame...
 
Upvote 0
sandgk;875801; said:
Davie - 1997-2001 - W-35 L-25, Bowl Game Wins - 0, Percentage 0.583

Willingham 2002-2004 W-21 L-16, Bowl Game Wins - 0, Percentage 0.568

Weis 2005-2006 W-19 L-6, Bowl Game Wins - 0, Percentage 0.760

He has at least turned around the Win-Loss numbers during the regular season.

What he has not done is win big games against USC or in Bowl Games. I figure they might get of the Bowl Game snide if they are willing to accept a lower bowl bid - somewhere with Blue Turf perhaps?

(Oh yes, the Buckeyes and 'SC - Winning Percentages of 0.880 and 0.885, both with only 3 losses over that period. The 0.880 percentage is a record shared by the Buckeyes, Texas Christian, and the 'Eers. The 0.885 only equaled by Texas in that 2-year span.)
Thanks Buddy, I knew I could depend on you to have that data at your fingertips.
Everything you say is what I said.
In recap, Weis isn't a bad coach and he certainly isnt a great coach and has a lot to do to get to that point, if ever.
He most certainly has made the Domers feel better about the program and that is a turnaround.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top