Citing teams' records is now "throwing out deceiving stats"?
You're the one who's leaving out information.
I'm talking about first round playoff matchups, and you're the one who's presenting evidence about strength of the conference without even bothering to mention the teams that the top seeds are playing against in the first round. Here's the rest of the information on non-conference records for playoff teams:
EAST:
MIA: 15-15
MIL: 15-15
CHA: 17-13
CHI: 13-17
WEST:
UTAH: 22-8
POR: 17-13
SA: 19-11
OKC: 22-8
The best non-conference record in the bottom half of the East bracket is equal to the worst non-conference record in the bottom half of the West bracket.
You're right that when you look at the top four in each conference that it's pretty much even. I'm talking about first round matchups though - there are no 1 vs. 4 or 2 vs. 3 matchups yet. When we're talking about 1 vs. 8, 2 vs. 7, etc. it's an easier road to the second round in the East than in the West.
Since your stat of choice is non-conference records instead of overall records, I'll illustrate it again this way: The Cavs were 23-7 vs. the West and they are playing a team right now in the Bulls that went 13-17 vs. the West. The Bulls sucked ass all year and the Cavs should be pounding them, but instead they've played down to their level on a few occasions in this series. The Lakers were 22-8 vs. the East, and are playing a team in the Thunder that also went 22-8 vs. the East. On paper at least, without having seen the Lakers play in this series it's more understandable to me for them to have a hiccup or two in the first round.