O.K., so if Quinn is injured, or if one of the other QBs does have a Pro Bowl season (however unlikely that may be) then why would the Browns want to have a second year QB making starter's money while riding the pine?
And at pick 22 (whether the Browns had him rated higher or not) why would they have their hand forced into declaring him the automatic starter in 2008? (Carson Palmer as an over-all #1 pick vs. the 2nd QB taken @ #22 is a huge difference) Is that what the Brown's Brass would hope for? Of course, but why paint yourself into a corner by offering him a contract that almost dictates it to have to happen? It seems smart to me to offer the escalators at least initially tied to starting...then if he's truly 'The Man', he makes money based on being the Brown's #1, and they have a guy who earned the spot.
Aaron Rogers was picked around the same pick wasn't he, and he was thought to be a top 10 pick before sliding that far. I assume the Packers thought Favre was a year or two away from retiring at the time. Would it have been a good move for Green Bay to 'assume' that Rogers would be the starter the following year, or even two, so they might as well give him 'starter's $$' in the 2nd year of his deal?
Wasn't it two years (at least) before Culpepper started for the Vikes?
And every penny that Akili Smith was paid was one more than he earned. I'm sure he had a nice contract regardless as a #3 pick, but I wish the Bengals would have convinced him to take a MoC-esque deal swimming with incentives rather than any guarenteed $$. (and yes, I'm quite aware that would never happen at that pick)
I don't think the Browns should give BQ (or anybody) a contract simply assuming he'll start next season barring injury. Rookie minimums at the #22 slot with incentives and escalators for starting, then bonuses for TDs / stats, Pro Bowls, etc.
just my opinion