Buckeye86;1753690; said:looks like we are fucked
This is all about appeasing Michigan. They want to be able to lose to us and not have it affect their division standings.
Upvote
0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Buckeye86;1753690; said:looks like we are fucked
Muck;1753636; said:Remember that in a few years because I guarantee it's not going to happen.
There is not going to be the build up for a mid season cross divisional game that comes anywhere close to the type of hype that has surrounded The Game in the past.
I would strongly agree with that, but michigan is being replaced with a 4th or 5th place team in psu as the roadblock.DallasHusker;1753675; said:Sorry, but I'll strongly disagree with that. Again, as a Husker fan of multiple decades, I won't claim to be any more unbiased in this than any of y are. But I'd say that Nebraska's arrival on the scene - looking at both current state and historical records over the last several decades - definitely means that UM is no longer a given as the "1B potential to always be a national power house" within the Big Ten.
muffler dragon;1753708; said:There are myriad reasons why splitting tOSU-Michigan is horrible. I can't think of a single horrible reason for keeping them in the same division. One game, all the marbles (when it gets to that point again). End of story.
Buckeye86;1753709; said:except it's not all of the marbles anymore even if we are in the same division due to the championship game
BigJim;1753673; said:I think it's pretty misleading to group those rivalries together and state the overarching conclusions you're getting from them. My comments in red on a game by game basis...
No one is arguing that keeping the game at the same time might diminish the rivalry (aside from the fact that a CCG might do that). Everyone pretty much knows that status quo couldn't hurt, which is all that I think your comments here help support. The question is whether an alternative could be just as good or better. The only example I see that is a good possible case study is the Miami/FSU one.
jlb1705;1753712; said:Fine, one game for half the marbles. It's better than one game of little consequence.
Buckeye86;1753690; said:looks like we are fucked
jlb1705;1753712; said:Fine, one game for half the marbles. It's better than one game of little consequence.
Tlangs;1753719; said:It's still for all the marbles in my opinion. Now the marbles are the CCG.
Buckeye86;1753709; said:except it's not all of the marbles anymore even if we are in the same division due to the championship game
BB73;1753723; said:It sure does look the decision has been made for a while. The timing of the comments from Smith, Brandon, and Gee have been planned to slowly let the [censored]ed off fans accept it. It even started back at the Big Ten Media days with comments by coaches.
The tOSU folks are all being good 'league players' and saying that it's OK with them. I really wonder how strongly they argued against it when the meaningful discussions were held.