• New here? Register here now for access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Plus, stay connected and follow BP on Instagram @buckeyeplanet and Facebook.

Big Ten and other Conference Expansion

Which Teams Should the Big Ten Add? (please limit to four selections)

  • Boston College

    Votes: 32 10.2%
  • Cincinnati

    Votes: 19 6.1%
  • Connecticut

    Votes: 6 1.9%
  • Duke

    Votes: 21 6.7%
  • Georgia Tech

    Votes: 55 17.6%
  • Kansas

    Votes: 46 14.7%
  • Maryland

    Votes: 67 21.4%
  • Missouri

    Votes: 90 28.8%
  • North Carolina

    Votes: 39 12.5%
  • Notre Dame

    Votes: 209 66.8%
  • Oklahoma

    Votes: 78 24.9%
  • Pittsburgh

    Votes: 45 14.4%
  • Rutgers

    Votes: 40 12.8%
  • Syracuse

    Votes: 18 5.8%
  • Texas

    Votes: 121 38.7%
  • Vanderbilt

    Votes: 15 4.8%
  • Virginia

    Votes: 47 15.0%
  • Virginia Tech

    Votes: 62 19.8%
  • Stay at 12 teams and don't expand

    Votes: 27 8.6%
  • Add some other school(s) not listed

    Votes: 25 8.0%

  • Total voters
    313
“The new entity being created would focus on business development, and it would include an outside investor with a small financial stake."

Sorry I missed this part. If the source is accurate that means they are creating a new entity (probably some sort of JV).

It gets real difficult to steal/fuck over/ strip assets from the B1G when you are only a financial partner in another entity.

I’ve seen some crazy shit but to date I’ve never seen anyone take anything from company A when they didn’t have any equity or a perfected debt interest to collateral of company A because they were business partners in company B (and only company B)

It’s almost like the B1G has some serious lawyers and consultants of their own that know how to structure a deal so they don’t get bitten while swimming with the sharks( on top of being on the side of real negotiating leverage because they don’t need the money).
 
Upvote 0
“The new entity being created would focus on business development, and it would include an outside investor with a small financial stake."

Sorry I missed this part. If the source is accurate that means they are creating a new entity (probably some sort of JV).

It gets real difficult to steal/fuck over/ strip assets from the B1G when you are only a financial partner in another entity.

I’ve seen some crazy shit but to date I’ve never seen anyone take anything from company A when they didn’t have any equity or a perfected debt interest to collateral of company A because they were business partners in company B (and only company B)

It’s almost like the B1G has some serious lawyers and consultants of their own that know how to structure a deal so they don’t get bitten while swimming with the sharks( on top of being on the side of real negotiating leverage because they don’t need the money).
Also the UC System has less incentive to fuck them over as long as UCLA is a member. Now maybe they will hem and haw about Cal but 10% non voting interest means they can't really force things. I was more worried about a 50/50 partnership ala Big Ten network
 
Upvote 0
Also the UC System has less incentive to fuck them over as long as UCLA is a member. Now maybe they will hem and haw about Cal but 10% non voting interest means they can't really force things. I was more worried about a 50/50 partnership ala Big Ten network
10% in a separate entity apparently.

You can’t force shit. If you can, then the other side made a bad deal.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top