• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Big Ten and other Conference Expansion

Which Teams Should the Big Ten Add? (please limit to four selections)

  • Boston College

    Votes: 32 10.2%
  • Cincinnati

    Votes: 19 6.1%
  • Connecticut

    Votes: 6 1.9%
  • Duke

    Votes: 21 6.7%
  • Georgia Tech

    Votes: 55 17.6%
  • Kansas

    Votes: 46 14.7%
  • Maryland

    Votes: 67 21.4%
  • Missouri

    Votes: 90 28.8%
  • North Carolina

    Votes: 39 12.5%
  • Notre Dame

    Votes: 209 66.8%
  • Oklahoma

    Votes: 78 24.9%
  • Pittsburgh

    Votes: 45 14.4%
  • Rutgers

    Votes: 40 12.8%
  • Syracuse

    Votes: 18 5.8%
  • Texas

    Votes: 121 38.7%
  • Vanderbilt

    Votes: 15 4.8%
  • Virginia

    Votes: 47 15.0%
  • Virginia Tech

    Votes: 62 19.8%
  • Stay at 12 teams and don't expand

    Votes: 27 8.6%
  • Add some other school(s) not listed

    Votes: 25 8.0%

  • Total voters
    313
No University would be footing that bill, a tv deal would. And they probably wouldn't get kicked out... but rather everyone leaves the "b1g ten" and joins the "B16" at an opportune time.
I guess it depends how much money the tv execs feel they're losing on the Indianas, Illinois, Purdues, etc.
The Big Ten is a brand. Whether or not the math makes sense, no one is leaving it voluntarily.

And really, no one is getting booted at this point because they suck at football. Sports revenue isn't the driving force anyway, it's the Billions of research dollars they are getting collectively....
 
Upvote 0
The Big Ten is a brand. Whether or not the math makes sense, no one is leaving it voluntarily.

And really, no one is getting booted at this point because they suck at football. Sports revenue isn't the driving force anyway, it's the Billions of research dollars they are getting collectively....

CIC is already a completely separate organization with different members.
We've got at least 7 "new" members who are experts at terraforming college football to the whims of tv execs.
That's just 4 shy of a voting majority.
The days of the old "big ten" are already over. You just haven't realized it yet.
 
Upvote 0
CIC is already a completely separate organization with different members.
We've got at least 7 "new" members who are experts at terraforming college football to the whims of tv execs.
That's just 4 shy of a voting majority.
The days of the old "big ten" are already over. You just haven't realized it yet.
You're looking at it like a sports fan.

College Presidents and administrators look at it entirely differently and in a business sense.
 
Upvote 0
So which way is it. They look at it in a business sense... that means tv execs win. And they have been winning.
Id argue it's you who sees it as a fan, and thinks 1890 means something.

In a business sense, why mess with a trademark that is already well-established and doesn't need to change?

And the TV execs probably know they aren't the ones driving the bus, ultimately. But hey, we can agree to disagree. Other moves would have happened, and happened much faster for ones that did happen, than what we've seen.

Edit: And remember, we're talking about a small piece of a much larger pie. By adding UW, Oregon, UCLA and USC, the Big Ten added something like $4 BILLION in research dollars to the pile.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top