Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
gbearbuck;2298443; said:What TV market do you pick up with Johns Hopkins? They are a great school with a great lax program, however you already have the Baltimore market with Maryland. Unless it is lax only, I don't get it (although from a shared research standpoint I could see why other Big Ten schools would have interest... Johns Hopkins is a better school than Northwestern imo)...
Piney;2298481; said:This would also be a great way to get Toronto in the Big 10... They become an affiliate member and just their hockey program competes in the Big 10
OSU_D/;2298497; said:Maybe this helps show a few of the East/Southeast schools that if they join the Big 10 their non-revenue sports won't suffer in competition. If only there was a way to fix Big 10 baseball.
Piney;2298481; said:But what if they only have ONE sport in Division I? The rest is Division III... So like kinda all of their sports that compete at the Big Ten level will be in the conference
Oh8ch;2298461; said:Because .......?
Buckeye Maniac;2298627; said:Because I think that allowing affiliate members is stupid. I think that the Big Ten should be the same schools no matter what sport they're playing, as long as the Big Ten supports that sport.
VBSJ;2298632; said:If that's the case, invite Fredo and Minnesota-Duluth for hockey.
Buckeye Maniac;2298627; said:Because I think that allowing affiliate members is stupid. I think that the Big Ten should be the same schools no matter what sport they're playing, as long as the Big Ten supports that sport.
matcar;2298701; said:Should we kick out the University of Chicago too?
ORD_Buckeye;2298702; said:U of C is a full CIC member, but they're not an affiliate member for any sports nor have any role in the athletic conference. As a founding member of the athletic conference, they are also somewhat of a unique situation. I'm all for letting JHU into the CIC, but I think it creates a very bad precedent to have affiliate members on the athletic side.
Next thing you know, we will be under (possibly political from the various state legislatures) pressure to let Bowling Green or some directional Michigans/regional Minnestotas in for hockey. The maggot domers will also undoubtedly start sniffing around trying to play and con us like the low rent, godforesaken grifters that they are.
ORD_Buckeye;2298702; said:U of C is a full CIC member, but they're not an affiliate member for any sports nor have any role in the athletic conference. As a founding member of the athletic conference, they are also somewhat of a unique situation. I'm all for letting JHU into the CIC, but I think it creates a very bad precedent to have affiliate members on the athletic side.
Next thing you know, we will be under (possibly political from the various state legislatures) pressure to let Bowling Green or some directional Michigans/regional Minnestotas in for hockey. The maggot domers will also undoubtedly start sniffing around trying to play and con us like the low rent, godforesaken grifters that they are.
OSU_D/;2298497; said:Maybe this helps show a few of the East/Southeast schools that if they join the Big 10 their non-revenue sports won't suffer in competition. If only there was a way to fix Big 10 baseball.
The most likely realignment scenario involves the Big Ten moving to 16 ? sources tell Sporting News it's not if, but when ? and the Big 12 setting its sights adding teams, perhaps Florida State and Clemson.