BB73;2000766; said:ummm 90 years ago Ohio State was in the Big Ten.
Go for 100.
This is true. Sorry about that.
I'm not to good with the maths.....
Upvote
0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
BB73;2000766; said:ummm 90 years ago Ohio State was in the Big Ten.
Go for 100.
BuckeyeMike80;2000760; said:
So playing the Big Ten schedule at the time is equivalent to playing 5 Ohio Wesleyan's?
Any serious conversation ends with that observation. BTW they played USC that year - you know USC - a school that has 11 recognized national championships, 4 of which came BEFORE your clearly incorrect 70 years ago timeframe.
Try again. Actually don't. please.
kn1f3party;2000773; said:You misinterpreted.
In the 15 years prior we played the following:
Fort Knox
NYU
Western Reserve
Ohio Wesleyan
Mount Union
Wittenberg
Muskingom
Kenyon
Denison
Drake
And USC was 5-5-1 that season. I made no reference to how relevant they were 20 years prior to that or 20 years after that.
kn1f3party;2000743; said:The way the system is now basically preserves the postseason to fewer teams than exist in the NFL. Is anybody getting tired of the same dozen or so schools yet?
Dryden;2000776; said:As long as Ohio State continues to be one of those dozen schools, I don't give a shit.
BB73;2000761; said:That's the 1942 schedule. FYI, Iowa Pre-Flight was prety good - they beat tOSU in the 1943 season opener and went on to finish second in the nation, receiving 12 first place votes in the Final AP poll. World War Two impacted a lot of football programs, and created some temporary powers in military training schools.
BuckeyeMike80;2000763; said:What the hell are you talking about??
Ever heard of Steve Young? How about LaVell Edwards??
How about Washington under Don James? They were fairly dominant in the 80s and 90s (which BTW, is about when Cryami and Florida showed up, unless they don't count either in your factually challenged observations)....
Georgia Tech? Umm John Heisman? Ever heard of him?
And while Colorado was never a year in and year out contender, they've historically (meaning in the past 40 years or so) been much better more consistently than they have since Gary Barnett ruined the program.
Check your history.
Dryden;2000776; said:As long as Ohio State continues to be one of those dozen schools, I don't give a [Mark May].
BuckeyeMike80;2000777; said:Yeah I really don't have any inclination to watch Purdue play Kansas in the Orange Bowl anytime soon....
or Syracuse playing Vanderbilt in the Sugar Bowl....
Or USF playing Washington State anywhere.....
kn1f3party;2000783; said:We're kind of getting off topic here and drifting toward playoff discussion. But obviously I care about what is best for Ohio State. But on a secondary level, I care about the integrity and legitemacy of the league they play in and it is hard for me to buy in to the national championship of FBS football when it is more about producing television revenue than actually determining the best team that season. It is hard for me to teach my children the morals there. That it doesn't matter how great of a team you're on, if you aren't on the wealthy team or the team with the most tradition you can't be a champion. It doesn't really matter how well you play. You're invisible in your league and you're only there to be a doormat for the rich and powerful. If you do start to rise out of your squalor, they'll just create a dozen barricades and twice as many excuses as to why you don't belong.
kn1f3party;2000779; said:K
You aren't reading what I'm writing or maybe I'm not being clear. Boise State is a more competitive program than all of them and has been for nearly a decade. How many more decades of them having exceptional seasons and the others being mediocre does it take until they're even in your eyes?
BuckeyeMike80;2000788; said:It's the newcomers that need to stick around for many of us to see them as anything but a flash in the pan.
And you seem to be conveniently skipping over the fact that Boysee State hasn't played in a legit conference until this year.
BuckeyeMike80;2000789; said:To answer your question - never.
College football is about tradition. Unless some of the mediocre schools de-establish football as a program, the newcomers won't ever truly eclipse them in terms of history or tradition.
kn1f3party;2000791; said:Life is unfair, I can accept that. But a team that has an argument for being in the mix for a championship being completely left out year after year, with no chance of joining a bigger conference because of population density, geography, and academics, is fucked up.
kn1f3party;2000756; said:No, I meant 70... Look at these world beaters we climbed to get there.
Fort Knox
IU (7-3)
USC (5-5-1)
Purdue (1-8)
Northwestern (1-9)
Pittsburgh (3-6)
Illinois (6-4)
Michigan (7-3)
Iowa Pre-Flight (7-3)
Not sure how different that is from the Mountain West of today. Obviously the game has changed quite a bit, but our only tough opponent that year was Wisconsin and we lost to them.
cincibuck;2000798; said:Picking a war year isn't exactly playing a trump card, but yeah...
Buckeye86;2000797; said:If anything, college football has went out of its way to give upshots like Boise a chance they don't deserve because they are the flavor of the decade. All of the things you listed will bring them crashing back down to earth eventually.