• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Big Ten and other Conference Expansion

Which Teams Should the Big Ten Add? (please limit to four selections)

  • Boston College

    Votes: 32 10.2%
  • Cincinnati

    Votes: 19 6.1%
  • Connecticut

    Votes: 6 1.9%
  • Duke

    Votes: 21 6.7%
  • Georgia Tech

    Votes: 55 17.6%
  • Kansas

    Votes: 46 14.7%
  • Maryland

    Votes: 67 21.4%
  • Missouri

    Votes: 90 28.8%
  • North Carolina

    Votes: 39 12.5%
  • Notre Dame

    Votes: 209 66.8%
  • Oklahoma

    Votes: 78 24.9%
  • Pittsburgh

    Votes: 45 14.4%
  • Rutgers

    Votes: 40 12.8%
  • Syracuse

    Votes: 18 5.8%
  • Texas

    Votes: 121 38.7%
  • Vanderbilt

    Votes: 15 4.8%
  • Virginia

    Votes: 47 15.0%
  • Virginia Tech

    Votes: 62 19.8%
  • Stay at 12 teams and don't expand

    Votes: 27 8.6%
  • Add some other school(s) not listed

    Votes: 25 8.0%

  • Total voters
    313
part of me still hopes Texas comes to the Big 10, another part of me hopes that the Texas schools go to the Pac 10 to create the most dysfunctional piece of shit mega conference possible

as has been said over and over, the only reason Texas joins the Pac 10 is because they are going to bend over backwards to accommodate them, which I am sure the current members will just love, and if they are admitted the Texas bloc is going to march in lockstep with one another

I just can't see that working out very well for any of the parties involved, especially since they don't have an established television network yet, I am sure the Texas schools are going to make that process as smooth as possible

it will be interesting, but I don't see a mega Pac 10 with the Texas schools being more viable long term than the current Big 12
 
Upvote 0
LordJeffBuck;1716298; said:
Well, it's official - according to ESPN Radio's John Kincaid, Nebraska "cut and ran" because they couldn't compete with Texas and Oklahoma in the Big XII, and their style of play will fit in better in the "plodding Big Ten". Thanks ESPN for reducing a very complex situation down to the sound bite stereotyope that you've been spewing for years.

Throughout this entire process E$PN has been on the outside looking in....I can't say I'm shocked one of the yappies finally started taking shots at the Big Ten.

I mean Colin Coward nearly committed seppuku when U$C was slapped with sanctions, Greenburg whined all week along about how unfair the entire process was and I'm sure the corporate types were pissed because now the Big Ten network will grow and (slightly) lessen their influence on Saturdays a bit more.
 
Upvote 0
Buckeye86;1716334; said:
part of me still hopes Texas comes to the Big 10, another part of me hopes that the Texas schools go to the Pac 10 to create the most dysfunctional piece of shit mega conference possible

as has been said over and over, the only reason Texas joins the Pac 10 is because they are going to bend over backwards to accommodate them, which I am sure the current members will just love, and if they are admitted the Texas bloc is going to march in lockstep with one another

I just can't see that working out very well for any of the parties involved, especially since they don't have an established television network yet, I am sure the Texas schools are going to make that process as smooth as possible

it will be interesting, but I don't see a mega Pac 10 with the Texas schools being more viable long term than the current Big 12

I think each point you made is widely believed among the college football world's fans and sportswriters. The Pac 10, with the Big XII South, just looks like a league waiting to fail. And Texas may not be worth the pains, if it really wants to flex its muscles like many say. But will the Pac 10 let Texas have its own network? If not, then why not the Big Ten, assuming they can play nicely and realize Northwestern and Indiana have as much say and rewards as they do. . .
 
Upvote 0
Chip Brown's latest speculation on what Texas will do if aTm goes to the SEC - this is from last night.

One thing I hadn't noticed before is that Texas President Bill Powers is a graduate of Cal (Berkeley).

Orangebloods
 
Upvote 0
No to Texas and ND.

Texas to the Pac-11 is a perfect senario right now. They want a conference they can dominate, and with the USC sanctions it is ripe for a Texas takeover. They aren't going to dominate the Big Ten ever, period.

ND? They just suck. We should focus your attentions higher. $$$? That will be going away soon, so not a good reason.

I'd rather see Missouri and Kansas than Texas and ND.
 
Upvote 0
Oh8ch;1716302; said:
Wasteful or not it certainly represents a significant step towards further commercialization.

This is not a company agreeing to sponsor a game, but to sponsor a university. It is the difference between the FedEx Orange Bowl and the FedEx Memphis Tigers. It is a step towards the Microsoft Buckeyes.



Oh yes they will.

The idea is to sponsor the Conference that would take Memphis, not Memphis specifically.
 
Upvote 0
A lenthy post by daddylew gives an in-depth perspective on Texas's current situation, and discusses the possibility of Texas and Oklahoma coming to the Big Ten (if the Sooners' academic standing could be accepted by the Big Ten).

I've only quoted a small part of his post.

NW.rivals

Texas and OU have little interest in joining the SEC; we have virtually nothing to gain and nearly everything to lose. However, our friends at Texas A&M have inexplicably decided that the value gained by thumbing their nose at Texas and joining the SEC may outweigh the costs of (1) moving a mediocre football team into football?s most difficult conference; (2) reducing the academic reputation of Texas A&M; (3) opening up Texas? fertile recruiting grounds to the sharks and paymasters of the SEC; (4) starting a ratings war in every Texas media market that will ultimately reduce the amount of money paid to both A&M and UT; and (5) dropping one of the most storied and financially lucrative intrastate rivalries in all of sports. Their logic is highly questionable, but it now appears likely that A&M will join the SEC.

In my view, there are currently five realistic scenarios:
1. A&M comes to their senses, and the whole group heads west.
2. A&M joins the SEC, and the remaining Big XII South teams (minus Baylor) head west.
3. A&M joins the SEC, Texas and OU join the Big Ten, and Tech joins the remnants of the Big XII in a new league.
4. Texas and Texas A&M both join the Big Ten.
5. Texas and Texas A&M both join the SEC.

I will not discuss the first scenario, as it has been discussed endlessly already. The second scenario is far less appealing to Texas since it will reduce our payout from the Pac-10 and will allow the SEC to begin aggressively recruiting in our backyard.

In contrast, the third scenario is extremely appealing to Texas. First, and most importantly, we join our preferred conference: the Big Ten. Second, we keep our traditional rivalry with OU, which means a lot more to Texas fans than our rivalries with A&M or Tech. Third, the combination of Texas AND OU will be enough to allow us to collectively maintain our recruiting dominance in Texas, even if A&M goes to the SEC. Fourth, the addition of Texas and OU will give us enough power within the Big Ten to not be rendered an afterthought in conference decisions. Fifth, the addition of OU would at least partially address our concerns about geography and spring sports. In a nutshell, UT will not join the Big Ten unless we can take at least one other team with us, and the most likely candidate at this point is OU.

Three obvious questions emerge. First, would the Big Ten be able to hold its nose and accept OU as a member? Second, how would this alleviate the political considerations that are currently preventing Texas from joining the Big Ten? Third, how would this resonate politically in Oklahoma?

Cont'd ...
 
Upvote 0
LordJeffBuck;1716298; said:
Well, it's official - according to ESPN Radio's John Kincaid, Nebraska "cut and ran" because they couldn't compete with Texas and Oklahoma in the Big XII, and their style of play will fit in better in the "plodding Big Ten". Thanks ESPN for reducing a very complex situation down to the sound bite stereotyope that you've been spewing for years.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-D7s8HnloUs]YouTube - SNL ESPN Classic Curling Gyne-Lotrimin Vaginal Creame[/ame]
 
Upvote 0
ORD_Buckeye;1716022; said:
Greatest SEC thread....EVER!

i guess what (woopig) is trying to say is, "yes we are stupid rednecks, but we can play some footBAWLLLL."

i certainly hope you have other hobbies, because whether or not your football team performs well on the field has NO bearing on your REAL life!


Nice :lol:
 
Upvote 0
LordJeffBuck;1716298; said:
Well, it's official - according to ESPN Radio's John Kincaid, Nebraska "cut and ran" because they couldn't compete with Texas and Oklahoma in the Big XII, and their style of play will fit in better in the "plodding Big Ten". Thanks ESPN for reducing a very complex situation down to the sound bite stereotyope that you've been spewing for years.

On the contrary, that's journalism so highly advanced that it goes right over our heads, but 14 year olds on message boards in Alabama understand it completely.
 
Upvote 0
Another thing to keep in mind is that the Big Ten is taking these teams/colleges in their entirety. What does Nebraska basketball bring to the Big Ten table? Baseball? Women's sports? Do they even have a hockey team?

Not even touching academics.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top