OCBucksFan
I won a math debate
harrydangler;898505; said:I thought I'd start a little debate.
Why does America hate the home run record holder until 20 years down the line?
When Ruth held it, fans and media hated the home run because it wasn't "real" baseball at the time. When Aaron broke the record, fans and media hated the fact he had 3000 more at bats than Ruth and wasn't a pure slugger not to mention he was African American. Now Barry has it and obviously fans and media hate the fact it's broke because of the roids issue and he's an angry sob.
It seems Amercan's hate the person that holds that record until 20 years after it's been broken. Will Barry be in that same situation (assuming ARod doesn't take it) 20-30 years from now?
The same applies to the single season home run record (see asterick *invented by Roger Maris).
I doubt anyone at any time is forgetting about Barry and this record, the main reason I think the memory will outlast the feelings people had before is how free information has become. Face it, as a kid you were shown videos of Babe Ruth and told hallowed storys, the facts were all but lost on him as a person except by people who knew him etc...
Aaron was a two-way story, I have heard many say that if Ruth had had as many at-bats as Aaron that record would have been well out of reach for anyone, but that's still not a valid argument and considering the era, a black athlete setting such a record is more what people recognize than anything else.
For Bonds, what's he got to make his story great? He's right in the middle of a scandal that has done tons of damage to the sport of baseball, there's information everywhere that is easily available that will continue to be that way, and his personality has shown, been caught on interviews, and the pictures of his throne in the locker room.
Bonds will most likely be seen as a dirtbag if someone doesn't come along and destroy his record before that time, which I believe will happen anyways.
Upvote
0