• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Are you stupid?? Take the Test.....

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Sort by date Sort by votes
I probably lost the 1% when I said 8 planets. :tongue2:

Your Score Summary
Overall, you scored as follows:
score_bar.php

99% scored higher (more stupid),
0% scored the same, and
1% scored lower (less stupid).
You are 1% stupid. This means...

You are our next Einstein. Wow! Keep up the great thinking.

​
 
Upvote 0
5% -- reading this thread, it's a ripoff I screwed on Pluto. Wondering what else I missed though.

Aha... apparantly I'm supposed to see frogs and missed the "F" -- don't know wtf is with that one, unless they're insinuating that ph is f?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
Your Score Summary
Overall, you scored as follows:
<a href="http://www.stupidtester.co...tupid! How stupid are you? Click Here!"> </a>
93% scored higher (more stupid),
2% scored the same, and
5% scored lower (less stupid).
You are 5% stupid. This means...

You are our next Einstein. Wow! Keep up the great thinking.​
 
Upvote 0
sandgk;772944; said:
In addition, the manner in which they ask about the Fibonacci sequence is strictly in error. It is better to begin the string thusly 0, 1, 1, 2, etc.
Click to expand...

No, it is not strictly in error. They actually ask about the Fibonacci sequence accurately. The Fibonacci sequence is a recursively defined sequence where the first two terms are defined as 1.
 
Upvote 0
buckiprof;773482; said:
No, it is not strictly in error. They actually ask about the Fibonacci sequence accurately. The Fibonacci sequence is a recursively defined sequence where the first two terms are defined as 1.
Click to expand...
Perhaps it is worth mentioning for the casual reader that either sequence 1,1, 2, OR 0, 1, 1, 2 .. is itself a Fibonacci sequence. The question then becomes which one is the "Original" Fibonacci sequence?

Perhaps it is the manner in which it was taught to me and you respectively.

Perhaps it is the manner in which it is now remembered.

Whatever the case may be there are apparently two accepted versions of the original sequence.

One leans on the rabbits problem in Fibonacci's book of teaching problems (Liber Abaci). The other which I was taught, has Fibonacci much like this:

470072226d1629b5b6b973f1881b2051.png


Thus the 0, 1, 1, 2 sequence.

I must candidly admit I also favor this precisely because it places at the beginning the Arabic zero - which Leonardo helped introduce into Western culture.
 
Upvote 0
Your Score Summary​
Overall, you scored as follows:​
score_bar.php
99% scored higher (more stupid),
1% scored the same, and
0% scored lower (less stupid).​
You are 0% stupid. This means...

You are our next Einstein. Wow! Keep up the great thinking.​

by the way, my answer for the number of planets was "8."
 
Upvote 0
OSU_Buckguy;773520; said:
by the way, here is a good test. my score is a 176. good luck.
Click to expand...

While the original test in this thread wasn't very rigorous (or draconian if you prefer...), that test isn't actually that great. I suppose if you're an English teacher it's great... but all it really tests is the level of rote memorization you have. There are a couple of words in there that you would probably only know through history and derive the etymology thus -- but that's still just straight "knowledge".
Of course, that is an important component to any test -- but it's just one part. I'm sure Joyce would score off the charts though. :biggrin:

FWIW, I got 155 -- which is in keeping with other standardized tests on the English language (60-75%).
 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top