billmac91
Head Coach
O'Rourke;1060578; said:There will be no coaching changes unless somebody leaves for a better/higher paying job. I'm not on the "death to Heacock" bandwagon, but I hope he learns some things from this game and the Illini game. We need to be less predictable on defense and mix up zone and man coverages without giving the call away before the ball is even snapped. You are allowed to drop a DE or DT into a shallow zone when running a zone blitz, it doesn't always have to be the four down linemen plus one guy who is right on the freaking LOS before the offense breaks the huddle. You can bring 2 or 3 LB's and a safety or CB up to the LOS and show blittz and then rush three and drop eight to mess with a QB trying to make a pre snap read. You don't have to run the same overload blitz on every single third down. Make the other team's QB THINK before he throws the ball, don't give the play away before the ball is even snapped.
Just by knowing the down/distance and seeing our defensive alignment I could predict what we were doing on D most of the time last night, and I'm just some guy who's watched all the games on TV. You know damn well that the LSU coaches watching film for over a month knew what was going on, that is why our guys looked so lost in the NC game. You can't just out-athlete every team, you've got to put those skilled players the NFL is drooling over in the right positions to make plays.
spot on analysis. We have such great athletes, the same caliber as LSU, USC, any other program in America. Our short-comings have been in execution and game planning.
I stated in another thread that we were definately more aggressive last night which was a good thing, but it was a passive-aggressive defense if that makes any type of sense.
Our blitzes were predictable. There was zero element of surprise. LSU knew exactly what to get and they got it.
In contrast, LSU brought 8 into the box on obvious throwing downs, and dared us to make a play. They challenged us to beat them, and had the confidence to do it.
Their CB's were practocally in the neutal zone waiting to defend our receivers. A far cry from our usual 10 yards off the line of scrimmage in a zone defense to protect against the big play.
Anyways, it isn't enough to just call a more aggressive gameplan as Heacock did. We need to disguise blitzes and defenses to force opposing QB's to think on the field instead of being able to make decesions pre-snap.
I miss the days of Antoine Winfield CB blitzes and leaving Shawn Springs on an island asking teams to throw at him. It's time to trust our athletes, and if they get beat once in a while, tip our hat to the other team and tell them they're going to have to do it again, because we're going to be aggressive all night.
Rant over.
Upvote
0