• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

AFC Championship Game: Ravens at Steelers(-4.5)

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Sort by date Sort by votes
buckeyebri;1384890; said:
That is fricking ridiculous...how does the ground cause it to be incomplete.....
Click to expand...

I can see the ground causing it if the player hasn't established himself on the turf yet.

But Santonio had taken 3 steps, albeit dragged steps as the defender had his legs. But he showed possesion, clear possesion, he actually transitioned the ball into his right arm and had it tucked possesion.

And yet since the ground caused the ball to come loose on the goalline, they make an awful ruling.

You have possesion when you are capable of catching it and putting it away, and reaching with it.

Again, common sense should prevail.
 
Upvote 0
billmac91;1384889; said:
LOL........That is unreal.

He plants two feet, and dives for the TD.

His control of the ball is as clear as day. Such an awful ruling. Common sense should prevail.
Click to expand...

That rule has been driving me nuts all year.
 
Upvote 0
BB73;1384893; said:
That rule has been driving me nuts all year.
Click to expand...

They have leeway when the player makes a "football move". Why is it not a football move when the receviver catches it, switches the ball to his right arm, and makes a dive at the endzone?

The officials blew it, IMO. They tried to go by the book, but the book even says they [censored]ed it up.
 
Upvote 0
billmac91;1384892; said:
I can see the ground causing it if the player hasn't established himself on the turf yet.

But Santonio had taken 3 steps, albeit dragged steps as the defender had his legs. But he showed possesion, clear possesion, he actually transitioned the ball into his right arm and had it tucked possesion.

And yet since the ground caused the ball to come loose on the goalline, they make an awful ruling.

You have possesion when you are capable of catching it and putting it away, and reaching with it.

Again, common sense should prevail.
Click to expand...


Now there you go trying to interject logic into the situation.....that is just plain crazy talk my friend...
 
Upvote 0
Jake;1383339; said:
It pains me to say it but I think the Steelers blow open a tight game in the second half, much like they did against the Chargers.
Click to expand...

Had a feeling this one would get away from the Ravens. It just happened sooner than I thought.
 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top