greyscarlet
Heisman
LordJeffBuck;1840441; said:I see no reason why the NCAA would allow the Sugar Bowl to count as one of the five games when they already reversed the Sugar Bowl suspensions that Ohio State imposed on the players. The NCAA would likely say, "Your guys were eligible to play. If you suspended your players for violations of team rules, then that's none of our business. Our suspension is for the first five games of the 2011 season. Case closed."
I wonder if there is precedence for this? I can't find any quickly. I would think that tressel will sit down and discuss what the players would prefer, suspension next year or suspension for the bowl and appeal for a reduction and the bowl game to count as 2 or 3 games (seeing as how the NCAA sees the bowl as a special opportunity). The NCAA loves precedence so if there is any that would answer the likely impact of suspending for the bowl game.
I don't know might be worth a shot. My guess is there are discussions going on in the background we will never hear about and having Mr Smith on our side will help our case either through influence or more likely proper perspective.
Upvote
0