Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
GomerBucks;2207782; said:Honestly, even though my DE has a ton of sacks, I really do not think it is anything I am doing, I always control the MLB or maybe a safety who is buzzing...
I think there is a precedent for complaints about JThorpe's play. This is not the first time he has been brought up for cheese or cheese like tendencies. I know I personally hate cheese...
JThorpe, I really don't know you and I am not childish enough to hate you purely because you are confused about which university is superior. Best of luck to you.
scott91575;2207786; said:My DE gets a lot of sacks, but the vast majority are from the computer sitting in the pocket way too long. I do control him in passing downs though. Not a whole lot of fun controlling a LB or S sitting in a zone defense.
Mac;2207793; said:I've never thought of my play as "cheese"...if it is I apologize, and I'll stop throwing to Buckner
Merih;2207775; said:Anybody else tired of having this same conversation every release?
The way I see it there are two options.
1. Say screw realism and just play anything goes. Probably lose 2-3 members.
2. Boot jthorp. Play a "realistic" style. If we go this route, make sure it's well understood that realism will apply to EVERYONE. Not just the guy that everybody gangs up against for that moment.
4. NO CHEESING. Do what you want against the CPU. However, against humans, it's straight-up play. I've played just about everybody in these leagues multiple times. Everybody's beaten me and I've beaten everybody. Without keeping stats, I'd guess my winning percentage against other users is around 50%. This is what, for me, makes the league fun. Do not run the same money plays over and over against humans. If you feel your opponent is cheesing, make sure you tell me about it. If you're exploiting a problem with the game's AI, and you know it, you're cheesing.
Mac;2207793; said:I've never thought of my play as "cheese"...if it is I apologize, and I'll stop throwing to Buckner
scott91575;2207800; said:How noble of you considering he is a senior and you only have 2 more games to play.
JK. I always meant to ask you "is your offense just throw it deep every play to Buckner?" I would love to run that offense if my QB could hit the side of a barn.
My offense completely revolves around the running game. Yet I do run a wide variety of runs. I do audible fairly often though (I would say about 1/3 of my runs I either end up flipping them or I completely change the play). Audibles are the key to the running game IMO.
GomerBucks;2207782; said:Honestly, even though my DE has a ton of sacks, I really do not think it is anything I am doing, I always control the MLB or maybe a safety who is buzzing...
I think there is a precedent for complaints about JThorpe's play. This is not the first time he has been brought up for cheese or cheese like tendencies. I know I personally hate cheese...
JThorpe, I really don't know you and I am not childish enough to hate you purely because you are confused about which university is superior. Best of luck to you.
Merih;2207811; said:It's not throwing to him, there's nothing wrong with having a focal point to your offense. But stat lines like this: 4 catches, 196 yards, 4 TDs
That's a tad cheese. Everyone is doing it with their wideouts though, I don't mean to single you out specifically. It's also against the computer, so I don't care as much.
Merih;2207811; said:It's not throwing to him, there's nothing wrong with having a focal point to your offense. But stat lines like this: 4 catches, 196 yards, 4 TDs
That's a tad cheese. Everyone is doing it with their wideouts though, I don't mean to single you out specifically. It's also against the computer, so I don't care as much.