• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

*2024 tCun Shenanigans, Arguments, Cobras, Feckless Marmots, Fake Pandas, Dirty Cheaters

12390687.png


The face of someone beginning to realize that the millstone hanging around his neck is career altering. He probably does not yet fully realize that his professional toxicity will be at Chernobyl levels before this is all over. Good luck tough guy.
Could be rough enough to bring him to tears!
 
Upvote 0
Yoko--despite turning off the ability to reply to his tweets--has now gone radio silent on twitter again. Poor Yoko. Because of timing, he'll get a pass on this one, but god damn do I hope that they call him out directly when they hand down the next round of violations. You wanted "multiple flagships," Ono. Well, you're getting multiple violations.

Just sayin': He represents "lack of institutional control" at the highest level.

What is institutional control?​

Institutional control refers to the efforts institutions make to comply with NCAA legislation and to detect and investigate violations that do occur. NCAA member institutions are obligated to maintain appropriate levels of institutional control.

What does it mean when an institution is found to have a lack of institutional control?​

A lack of institutional control is found when the Committee on Infractions determines that major violations occurred and the institution failed to display:
  • Adequate compliance measures.
  • Appropriate education on those compliance measures.
  • Sufficient monitoring to ensure the compliance measures are followed.
  • Swift action upon learning of a violation.

How is a lack-of-institutional-control violation different from a failure-to-monitor violation?​

A failure-to-monitor violation, although serious, is a separate and distinct violation that is considered less significant than a lack of institutional control. Violations resulting from a failure-to-monitor violation are usually limited in scope and do not involve the widespread inadequacies in rules-compliance systems and functions that are often found in lack-of-institutional-control cases.

Can individuals be charged with a lack of institutional control or failure to monitor?​

Yes. Coaches and staff members can be held personally responsible for failing to adequately monitor and exercise appropriate control over rules compliance in an athletics department or within a sport program. NCAA bylaws require head coaches to promote an atmosphere for compliance and to monitor the rules compliance of those who report to them.
 
Upvote 0
439315350_398956702983956_2180018174013546365_n.jpg


:lol:

Let's hope it doesn't take that long.
Based on what the B1G said was known and could be proven last November, it seems very likely that this will age poorly

I know many of you are pessimistic. To be honest; I'm pessimistic too. I don't think anyone on this board thinks they'll get what they actually deserve. But I don't think it's remotely rational to believe that this will not include penalties that will make the person who made this meme look like the idiot he is.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
Based on what the B1G said was known and could be proven last November, it seems very likely that this will age poorly

I know many of you are pessimistic. To be honest; I'm pessimistic too. I don't think anyone on this board thinks they'll get what the actually deserve. But I don't think it's remotely rational to believe that this will not include penalties that will make the person who made this meme look like the idiot he is.

It will be interesting to see how many level 1 violations the NCAA finds. I do think some additional sanctions will eventually come down. They may even get some wins vacated, a "bowl ban", and the only coach left that was primarily involved (i.e. Moore) might get a "show cause" etc. However, I'll predict that if they get any wins vacated it will probably end at the Sparty game (about the time Stallions was fired) and the National Championship will stand.
 
Upvote 0
It will be interesting to see how many level 1 violations the NCAA finds. I do think some additional sanctions will eventually come down. They may even get some wins vacated, a "bowl ban", and the only coach left that was primarily involved (i.e. Moore) might get a "show cause" etc. However, I'll predict that if they get any wins vacated it will probably end at the Sparty game (about the time Stallions was fired) and the National Championship will stand.
Will the NCAA even have governance of college football by then?
 
Upvote 0
NCAA is probably preferable for them rather than having the B1G and SEC schools that they cheated against being the ones who swing the axe.
Maybe, But I think if the NCAA doesn't do something in time, the Big Ten and SEC coalition will start anew and everyone has clean slates.

As for that cartoon, I hope I'm still pissed in 45 years. Never forget their cheating, even if they do get some kind of punishment. And I hope I'm still pissed because the only time in the next 45 years that they won The Game was these last 3 years, vacated or not.
 
Upvote 0
Maybe, But I think if the NCAA doesn't do something in time, the Big Ten and SEC coalition will start anew and everyone has clean slates.

As for that cartoon, I hope I'm still pissed in 45 years. Never forget their cheating, even if they do get some kind of punishment. And I hope I'm still pissed because the only time in the next 45 years that they won The Game was these last 3 years, vacated or not.
In 45 years, I’ll be 126. I guess I’ll still be pissed. If I can just remember why.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top